We performed a comparison between Microsoft Power Automate and Robocorp based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is Microsoft. So, you get the integration capability."
"The product is very reliable and very easy to use."
"The technical support is good."
"The initial setup is very simple."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it easily integrates with Azure DevOps."
"I like that Power Automate gives us a connector to be able to connect different data sources or different software."
"Technical support is available regionally and it's quite good."
"Instead of manually triggering payments through the website, everything was done through robotic process automation (RPA), saving us a lot of time."
"Robocorp is based on Python, so you can use Python scripts and create libraries for your use cases. Building libraries and custom scripts for a particular client and general use cases is easy. We can reuse those scripts for other clients, so we start seeing benefits quickly."
"I can use it as a library by importing Python scripts, allowing me to access its many features while working with coding."
"The solution is based on Python which makes it very valuable."
"It offers high scalability and enables automation in ways that haven't been possible before."
"It supports Python runtime because of that, runtime also improves."
"I like the fact that it's very fast. The processing speed is good, and that's what matters to me. I also like that we don't have to bother with the infrastructure setup. We don't have to care about the status of the data set, as I believe the local group will provide it. We don't care about the licensing model. We only have to care about how long we are using it."
"As a developer, I found it easy to integrate third-party applications with Robocorp. I have previous experience with Selenium, and I found the Robocorp framework to be accessible because it uses Python and Selenium keywords."
"It's easy to deploy bots via the API helper in Control Room. Robocorp's debugging features are also robust. It shows you a lot of data."
"The OCR functionality needs to be improved."
"We are looking to see more features implemented there are already available in UiPath or Automation Anywhere."
"I would like to have chatbot assistance available, where you can open it and receive help on the spot."
"We find the solution to be not that user-friendly, and might be using the older version, which really did not have a lot of features, so my review is mostly based on the older version."
"Better support is needed for building custom components on top of ProcessRobot."
"There is a limitation in setting up loops, where it does not support multiple conditions."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The thing which needs the most improvement is really the documentation. It should have better details of the processes."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly for non-technical users. It would be better if they had some drag-and-drop features to create logic."
"The deployment process is complex and not straightforward, especially for legacy modernization."
"I preferred the user interface in the older versions. When troubleshooting, it's sometimes hard to find details about where things went wrong. You need to search a little harder. It takes more clicks to get to where you want to go. It can be somewhat confusing. When you run a process that fails, it takes you somewhere you may not expect."
"An additional feature I'm looking for in Robocorp is SAP automation."
"The solution could be more stable."
"There are certain libraries in Python, such as those dealing with PDF automation and word files, that require the presence of certain external dependencies in the environment to be successfully used."
"Robocorp is still in development, so most of the keywords are a bit confusing. I have to alter lots of automation steps between processing and development. However, Selenium is due for an update soon, and Robcorp is addressing some of the limitations caused by the previous Selenium version."
"We use the latest version of the process studio and it takes up a lot of CPU storage. In our case, this has been up to 14 GB of storage."
Microsoft Power Automate is ranked 2nd in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 123 reviews while Robocorp is ranked 11th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 13 reviews. Microsoft Power Automate is rated 7.8, while Robocorp is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft Power Automate writes "Provides valuable integration with other Microsoft tools". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Robocorp writes "The Python base is very valuable for AI and data science but stability could improve". Microsoft Power Automate is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, IBM Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and ABBYY Vantage, whereas Robocorp is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism Cloud, ElectroNeek and Blue Prism. See our Microsoft Power Automate vs. Robocorp report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.