We compared UiPath and Robocorp based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
UiPath is praised for its user-friendly interface, extensive automation capabilities, seamless integration, robust security, effective customer service, reasonable pricing, and high ROI. Robocorp, on the other hand, is highlighted for its intuitive interface, reliable performance, efficient customer service, competitive pricing, and positive ROI. However, users mention that Robocorp could improve user-friendly features, stability, error handling, documentation, and customer support.
Features: UiPath is praised for its user-friendly interface, extensive automation capabilities, seamless integration, and robust security measures. On the other hand, Robocorp is valued for its intuitive interface, seamless automation, and reliable performance.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for UiPath is described as straightforward and hassle-free, with flexible licensing options. Robocorp, on the other hand, offers a minimal setup cost and a straightforward licensing process, with users appreciating its affordability and ease of getting started., UiPath's ROI is described as substantial, with users mentioning cost savings, increased efficiency, and improved productivity. Robocorp also delivers a positive ROI, with significant time savings and improved productivity reported by users. Both platforms have user-friendly interfaces and seamless integration capabilities.
Room for Improvement: UiPath has room for improvement in terms of user interface, functionality, and performance. Users desire a more intuitive interface and additional features. Robocorp lacks user-friendly features, stability, and better error handling. Comprehensive documentation and improved customer support are also needed.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews comparing UiPath and Robocorp indicate that there are varying durations for deployment, setup, and implementation phases when establishing a new tech solution. Some users mentioned spending three months on deployment and an additional week on setup for UiPath, while others mentioned spending a week on both deployment and setup for both UiPath and Robocorp., UiPath's customer service and support are highly regarded, with users praising the promptness and effectiveness of the team. Robocorp's customer service is also highly praised, emphasizing the understanding and helpfulness exhibited by their team.
The summary above is based on 325 interviews we conducted recently with UiPath and Robocorp users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"I have worked with UiPath and Automation Anywhere previously. Robocorp offers an improved development style and support as well as flexibility of its tools. You can easily develop custom libraries in Robocorp."
"The ability to create separate organizations on this platform makes it easier to bill each of the clients separately."
"It supports Python runtime because of that, runtime also improves."
"The process execution and all features are very good."
"It's easy to deploy bots via the API helper in Control Room. Robocorp's debugging features are also robust. It shows you a lot of data."
"The product has a valuable business process automation feature."
"I can use it as a library by importing Python scripts, allowing me to access its many features while working with coding."
"As a developer, I found it easy to integrate third-party applications with Robocorp. I have previous experience with Selenium, and I found the Robocorp framework to be accessible because it uses Python and Selenium keywords."
"The most valuable thing about this solution is that it is easy to develop and easy to train everyone how to use."
"It's incredibly user-friendly, making it accessible even to non-developers."
"UiPath has saved the company costs."
"UiPath is also the best tool for a beginner or someone who has no knowledge of programming. It is easy to learn quickly and to understand. You can get working in it much more quickly than if you had to acquire a programming background."
"Our consultants have been able to go through the training videos and pick up the ability to build their own automations."
"It is user-friendly and significantly speeds up the development process."
"It offers me various benefits such as AI capabilities and works very well for me on all types of processes. It makes our tasks easy and provides accurate results."
"UiPath Academy courses... are our entire training platform. We brought people who are not IT-savvy, complete laymen who were not in IT at all, into our platform of technology. To do that conversion, the Academy had to be very strong."
"Robocorp is still in development, so most of the keywords are a bit confusing. I have to alter lots of automation steps between processing and development. However, Selenium is due for an update soon, and Robcorp is addressing some of the limitations caused by the previous Selenium version."
"I don't like the complexity of deployment."
"They should fully develop Robocorp Studio because it would attract a lot of people to the Robocorp platform."
"The solution could be more stable."
"The deployment process is complex and not straightforward, especially for legacy modernization."
"There are certain libraries in Python, such as those dealing with PDF automation and word files, that require the presence of certain external dependencies in the environment to be successfully used."
"It would be better if it were more user-friendly for non-technical users. It would be better if they had some drag-and-drop features to create logic."
"We use the latest version of the process studio and it takes up a lot of CPU storage. In our case, this has been up to 14 GB of storage."
"I would like to have a guidebook of examples that help me to determine the feasibility of specific use cases, based on the tools and the features that are out there."
"My team has just been learning UiPath for the past three to four months, and they are still hitting a wall in certain areas that they have to dig out of."
"It's really hard for me to get all the machine learning and AI parts. I think maybe that's going to get a little bit easier for me to understand how to really use it in the company. I don't really know what to do with it at the moment. I think that is something that could be improved."
"I would like a better way to find the little things that aren't simply named."
"I would like to see more integration with solutions, like SAP, especially because the biggest companies have a lot of SAP implementations going on. If they would have more packages to support native SAP activities or perform connectivity to some of those SAP clients in transaction codes, it would be awesome."
"I am looking forward to new cognitive and artificial intelligence capabilities."
"There has been a huge improvement in Linux, Microsoft, and Mac support recently. However, we still struggle with the implementation in Citrix environments. The solution works with Citrix, but there is room for improvement."
"The add-ons are not well documented."
Robocorp is ranked 11th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 13 reviews while UiPath is ranked 1st in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 760 reviews. Robocorp is rated 7.6, while UiPath is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Robocorp writes "The Python base is very valuable for AI and data science but stability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of UiPath writes "Facilitates end-to-end automation, has good AI and document understanding capabilities, and saves us costs previously spent on manual tasks". Robocorp is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism Cloud, ElectroNeek and Blue Prism, whereas UiPath is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, Automation Anywhere (AA), Blue Prism, Pega Robotic Process Automation and Tungsten RPA. See our Robocorp vs. UiPath report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
