Microsoft Teams vs Oracle WebCenter comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
284 views|106 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
38 views|32 comparisons
70% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Oracle WebCenter based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle WebCenter Report (Updated: March 2020).
769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool's integration with OneNote and Power BI is good. The current version of Microsoft Teams is significantly more user-friendly compared to previous versions. I find it easy to handle any user needs and provide assistance. The device installation process is straightforward, and configuring it for users is not complicated. This seamless and user-friendly experience makes it easy to connect with everyone.""It provides a collaborative space for efficient work processes.""The product is more convenient than taking a plane to Australia. Going to Australia can take around two days. The tool is much quicker. The video conferencing feature has improved our productivity.""The most valuable feature for us was instant messaging.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is that I can attach files in any format.""Using the solution's screen-sharing feature, we can go through a document together and take control.""The most valuable features of Microsoft Teams are the calendar integration and the integration of chat and chat history into events.""I use the solution for messaging and chatting."

More Microsoft Teams Pros →

"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data.""The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet.""You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server.""Integration within the solution is very good.""It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage.""A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access.""WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."

More Oracle WebCenter Pros →

Cons
"There needs to be a robust change management platform that offers training to keep the user community aware of upcoming updates and features.""The solution needs to have subtitles.""We have experienced response delays with the product. It can be hard to understand where to click in the solution. Also, the solution should incorporate videos like 'How to use Teams' that can be popularized among customers.""Microsoft Teams does not have any features that Zoom, Skype, or Webex don't already have.""It would be good if the solution had some sort of AI built into it while taking the transcript so that at least the sentences made sense.""The UI can be further improved upon. When I used to use Skype, Skype was a small window that opened on your desktop. With Teams, when you use it, it occupies your full screen just like if you were in Word or Excel. Skype worked more like an app, which I preferred. I liked being able to use it in a minimized screen. If Teams could emulate that a bit, it would be a better user experience.""Whiteboard should be standard rather than an app.""The user interface is non-intuitive and should be improved."

More Microsoft Teams Cons →

"The speed of the backup should be enhanced.""Its functions need more stability.""Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version.""The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product.""This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language.""WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system.""There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market.""I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."

More Oracle WebCenter Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is free to a threshold and then after that you have to license per user."
  • "It is the standard license which is part of many Office packets."
  • "We are satisfied with the price of this solution."
  • "If you have content that requires more security and you want to use it in a more secure manner, with more protection, then it will come at a higher cost."
  • "If you have clients who do not have a computer and are joining with their phones it's an additional fee of $5.00 per user."
  • "The pricing for Teams is very competitive."
  • "My understanding is that there are licensing fees, but I'm not sure how much they might be."
  • "It is affordable because it also includes the licenses on Microsoft Word, Microsoft Office and SharePoint."
  • More Microsoft Teams Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price needs to be lowered."
  • "The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."
  • "WebCenter's pricing is on the higher side."
  • More Oracle WebCenter Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams for us is the ability to share files from OneDrive seamlessly.
    Top Answer:For setup costs, pricing, and licensing, I advise considering the flexibility offered by site licenses. However, it's important to be aware of potential fluctuations in pricing, as they can vary… more »
    Top Answer:One area where the product could be improved is its operational memory utilization. Currently, Microsoft Teams consumes a significant amount of memory when in use, which can pose challenges for users… more »
    Top Answer:WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly.
    Top Answer:WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system. Its performance is also not up to the market standard, and its agility and adaptability could be improved.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    284
    Comparisons
    106
    Reviews
    105
    Average Words per Review
    328
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    38
    Comparisons
    32
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    189
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Teams
    WebCenter, FatWire
    Learn More
    Overview

    At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

    We do business in 170 countries and are made up of 114,000 passionate employees dedicated to fulfilling our mission of helping you and your organization achieve more.

    Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. 

    Sample Customers
    Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
    Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization61%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government4%
    Computer Software Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Pharma/Biotech Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Marketing Services Firm11%
    Transportation Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    University9%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise63%
    Large Enterprise30%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle WebCenter
    March 2020
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle WebCenter and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
    769,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while Oracle WebCenter is ranked 22nd in Customer Experience Management with 12 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter, whereas Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite and Liferay Digital Experience Platform. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Oracle WebCenter report.

    We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.