We performed a comparison between Oracle WebCenter and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."
"The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."
"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."
"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."
"Integration within the solution is very good."
"It allows for simultaneous users to be on it."
"Ability to store files of any type."
"SharePoint is already moving to cloud, if you are using SharePoint online, which is cloud-based technology, it is more accessible."
"We can arrange all our documents on one platform and see the document's changes and edits."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news."
"The product makes it easy to manage lists, forms, searching, and security. One of the most valuable features is its integration with Active Directory."
"Combined reports and data with timeline tracking."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."
"Its functions need more stability."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."
"During uptime under our network, it is hard to find info when content is hefty."
"You still need a bit of expertise to add branding."
"There are some limitations on storage."
"The solution lacks collaboration features."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"The limitations and boundaries must be extended."
"Replication needs improvement."
Oracle WebCenter is ranked 15th in Enterprise Content Management with 12 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Gives me easy access, connection and compatibility with all of the Oracle products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and IBM FileNet, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Box. See our Oracle WebCenter vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors, best Web Content Management vendors, and best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.