We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It saves time as tasks are automated."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"It has integration with BI and Analytics tools, and RPA toolsets as well."
"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."
"It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well."
"webMethods Integration Server is an easy-to-use solution and does not require a lot of coding."
"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."
"Broker and UM are the best features."
"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."
"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."
"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."
"Best feature is Insight for monitoring, and as a debugging tool. It has saved us a lot of time during crisis situations."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"Currently, copying workflow actions from one workflow to another is not possible. Also, the Office 365 solution is not as mature as on-premise."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"In terms of improvement, it would be better if it adapted quicker to open standards. It took a while for API specification before the last version was available. The spec of version two was rather quick."
"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."
"Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion."
"There should be better logging, or a better dashboard, to allow you to see see the logs of the services."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"It could be more user-friendly."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
