We performed a comparison between OpenText ProVision and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."All the features come as part of a standard license."
"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."
"The product's most valuable feature is the transformation process."
"A complete business project management suite which seems to open endless possibility."
"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."
"The most valuable feature for me is the collaboration point of view, where everybody has a single view, or source of truth, and everybody sees the same thing. Everyone can comment, contribute, and discuss the processes itself, which makes it easier to funnel down the most value adding comments and make the relevant changes to the processes. This leads to the next best iteration or version of your process."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager is very responsive."
"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."
"As a business transformation suite, Signavio offers a number of integrated helpful tools. The Process Modeler helps with the conceptual work, but is directly integrated with the components of the Workflow Accelerator (Automation) and the Process Intelligence (Mining). This makes Signavio an indispensable service package."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager's UI is not user-friendly. Its pricing is also high."
"The user management functionality in Process Manager is not as user friendly as the one in the Collaboration Hub."
"I would like to see the inclusion of some document management functionality so that we don't need to integrate with a second solution to accommodate this."
"I find it difficult to figure out how I can better align this solution with my KPIs."
"The tool's navigation could be improved."
OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our OpenText ProVision vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
