We performed a comparison between Oracle WebCenter and WordPress based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet."
"Integration within the solution is very good."
"WebCenter's interface is very user-friendly."
"It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage."
"You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server."
"Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data."
"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access."
"I like how it integrates graphics and words, and more generally, the way people can develop the choices of spaces for different websites."
"This program has made it possible for our company to advertise all around the country, instead of keeping it local."
"I like the tool's plugins."
"There are so many free plugins"
"The most valuable features of the solution are its flexibility, ease of working with, intuitive interface, and ease of finding a huge online community, along with its simplicity of integration with other solutions."
"The best feature in WordPress is Elementor. It lets you easily create one-page landing sites."
"We use WordPress on two different websites and it solves all of our website issues."
"The standout feature is its high degree of customization. Creating user-friendly, easily maintainable websites is a breeze, especially with the convenient admin access."
"The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."
"There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market."
"Its functions need more stability."
"WebCenter requires a lot of design effort to upload content to our regular system."
"The speed of the backup should be enhanced."
"I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features."
"This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language."
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version."
"I would like to see the addition of social media integration features in WordPress."
"It may be useful to have a downloadable program that you could have on your desktop that allows you to create and maintain the program while offline."
"Backups and moving sites could be handled better."
"WordPress needs to improve its usability."
"A user may feel intimidated the first time he or she sees it."
"I would like to have the ability to customize the whole WordPress installation. WordPress comes with a number of core features. I would love to be able to remove those I'm not using at the moment."
"The backend development process needs improvement."
"It could be a little bit easier to use."
Oracle WebCenter is ranked 7th in Web Content Management with 12 reviews while WordPress is ranked 2nd in Web Content Management with 28 reviews. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.0, while WordPress is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has a user-friendly interface but performance is not up to scratch". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WordPress writes "Very customizable, and forms the base for most websites on the Internet". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content Management, SharePoint, Adobe Experience Manager, WebLogic Suite and OpenText Documentum, whereas WordPress is most compared with SharePoint, Quintype, Adobe Experience Manager, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and SDL Tridion DX.
See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.