Compare Oracle WebCenter vs. WordPress

Oracle WebCenter is ranked 6th in Web Content Management with 5 reviews while WordPress is ranked 2nd in Web Content Management with 5 reviews. Oracle WebCenter is rated 7.8, while WordPress is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has the ability to move workloads in between sub-servers but the backups should be faster ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WordPress writes "Lots of flexibility for integrations and ability to create simpler as well as more complex sites". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with SharePoint, WebLogic Suite and Oracle Content and Experience Cloud, whereas WordPress is most compared with SharePoint, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and Plone. See our Oracle WebCenter vs. WordPress report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle WebCenter Logo
3,175 views|2,564 comparisons
WordPress Logo
3,329 views|2,793 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle WebCenter vs. WordPress and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server.It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage.Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data.A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access.The WebCenter Content is its most valuable feature. After we update a document in WebCenter Content, it can be update automatically in our intranet.

Read more »

We use WordPress on two different websites and it solves all of our website issues.It is a stable system which offers a wide variety of themes and templates.As WordPress is such a popular product, there are many designers and developers available to work on projects.Ready-made themes speed the design process; a huge number of quality themes are available from several sources.Good for rapidly turning around all the elements required for online sales funnels.

Read more »

Cons
The speed of the backup should be enhanced.There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market.This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language.Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version.I would like them to add more Web 2.0 features.Its functions need more stability.

Read more »

I would recommend dumping the Gutenberg interface, as that is horrible.The system should be more informative.The basic product is becoming less usable by end users for site maintenance post delivery.Backups and moving sites could be handled better.WordPress sites do require quite a bit of maintenance: Constant updates to both WordPress and all the various plugins that it requires.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent.The price needs to be lowered.

Read more »

Set up cost is nothing. Pricing is free. You need to pay a cost only for the domains, hosting, and to buy themes.It provides a high ROI.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
Views
3,175
Comparisons
2,564
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
430
Avg. Rating
8.0
2nd
Views
3,329
Comparisons
2,793
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
393
Avg. Rating
9.2
Top Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 40% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Also Known As
WebCenter, FatWire
Learn
Oracle
Wordpress
Video Not Available
Overview

Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. 

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system (CMS) based on PHP and MySQL. WordPress is installed on a web server, which either is part of an Internet hosting service or is a network host itself; the first case may be on a service like WordPress.com, for example, and the second case is a computer running the software package WordPress.org. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle WebCenter
Learn more about WordPress
Sample Customers
Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and FisheriesTIBCO Software, Code for America, Crosswise, Essio Shower, AdLemons, Applied Geographics
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Transportation Company14%
Pharma/Biotech Company14%
Marketing Services Firm14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company57%
Government9%
Comms Service Provider5%
Outsourcing Company5%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle WebCenter vs. WordPress and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
389,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.