Compare Oracle WebCenter vs. WordPress

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle WebCenter Logo
2,778 views|2,169 comparisons
WordPress Logo
4,936 views|4,292 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"A great solution for storing and searching large volumes of documents with easy access.""Oracle integrates well with other products to cover Big Data.""It's a very scalable solution and the performance is pretty good. The scalability, in my opinion, is the biggest advantage.""You can move workloads in between sub-servers so that you don't overload a portion of the server.""Integration within the solution is very good."

More Oracle WebCenter Pros »

"I like how it integrates graphics and words, and more generally, the way people can develop the choices of spaces for different websites."

More WordPress Pros »

Cons
"Does not seem to be totally compatible with Windows 10 as of our current version.""This solution needs to support translation into the Arabic language.""There are many document management systems that offer pretty much the same functionalities but at a lower price. The product as such is pretty good. However, the pricing is not comparable. They need to adjust their pricing to be more competitive on the market.""The speed of the backup should be enhanced.""The solution should be offered in Persian. Right now, our version is in English, and there's a bit of a language barrier between the users and the product."

More Oracle WebCenter Cons »

"I think that WordPress is too cool in its contact."

More WordPress Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price of this solution is considered to be high; however, when speaking with Oracle, it is possible to get discounts of up to sixty percent."

More Oracle WebCenter Pricing and Cost Advice »

"I paid to have a WordPress site for two years and didn't just have a free one."

More WordPress Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: I like how it integrates graphics and words, and more generally, the way people can develop the choices of spaces for different websites.
Top Answer: I paid to have a WordPress site for two years and didn't just have a free one. Unfortunately, the site was awful and I never made good use of spending all that money.
Top Answer: I think that WordPress is too cool in its contact. If somebody works well in that medium then it would be really helpful for a community and for themselves. I don't know how to plug them into using it… more »
Ranking
3rd
Views
2,778
Comparisons
2,169
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
558
Rating
8.8
5th
Views
4,936
Comparisons
4,292
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
1,485
Rating
1.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
WebCenter, FatWire
Learn More
Wordpress
Video Not Available
Overview

Oracle WebCenter is the center of engagement for business powering exceptional experiences for customers, partners, and employees. It connects people, processes, and information with the most complete portfolio of portal, content management, Web experience management, and collaboration technologies. 

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system (CMS) based on PHP and MySQL. WordPress is installed on a web server, which either is part of an Internet hosting service or is a network host itself; the first case may be on a service like WordPress.com, for example, and the second case is a computer running the software package WordPress.org. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Offer
Learn more about Oracle WebCenter
Learn more about WordPress
Sample Customers
Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society, Jagran Prakashan Ltd., Standard Forwarding LLC, United Automotive Electronic Systems Co. Ltd., INSO sistemi per le infrastrutture sociali S.p.A., Helsana Versicherungen AG, ArRiyadh Development Authority, John Lewis Partnership, Arqiva, SURUGADAI EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE, Portuguese Official Agriculture and Fisheries
TIBCO Software, Code for America, Crosswise, Essio Shower, AdLemons, Applied Geographics
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Pharma/Biotech Company25%
Healthcare Company13%
Marketing Services Firm13%
Transportation Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company50%
Insurance Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
Financial Services Firm5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider24%
Computer Software Company19%
Government7%
Educational Organization5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise64%
REVIEWERS
Small Business75%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Liferay, Oracle and others in Web Content Management. Updated: July 2021.
521,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Oracle WebCenter is ranked 3rd in Web Content Management with 5 reviews while WordPress is ranked 5th in Web Content Management with 1 review. Oracle WebCenter is rated 8.8, while WordPress is rated 1.0. The top reviewer of Oracle WebCenter writes "Has the ability to move workloads in between sub-servers but the backups should be faster ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WordPress writes "Difficult to create content without spending a lot of time to learn it". Oracle WebCenter is most compared with Oracle Content and Experience Cloud, SharePoint, WebLogic Suite, Adobe Experience Manager and OpenText Documentum, whereas WordPress is most compared with SharePoint, Magnolia CMS, Drupal, Liferay Digital Experience Platform and TerminalFour Site Manager.

See our list of best Web Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.