We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and TIBCO BusinessWorks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary."
"It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."
"Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework."
"The monitoring tools are the most valuable feature."
"t is a pretty stable solution. I have not seen any outages in the solution."
"The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."
"It is a very robust system."
"The most valuable features are the stability and the time to market."
"The ability to link to different technologies is valuable to us."
"The most valuable feature is the integration."
"The Business Studio interface based on SCA Standards helps to show the business logic at first look and improve code maintenance."
"The high availability, tolerance, and load balancing features are top-notch. Its scalability features are also pretty cool."
"It is a seamless and sophisticated tool."
"Good performance and reliability."
"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."
"This is an on-premise platform and one area they can improve on is having the ability to work with SaaS solutions."
"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."
"I think the main area that SAP PO should improve on is offering pre-delivered content like they do when you use SAP Cloud Platform Integration (CPI). SAP should not forget that they still have a lot of customers using Process Orchestration and they should focus more on providing pre-delivered content in SAP PO."
"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved."
"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."
"It is not a scalable solution for the cloud. I would not recommend this for the cloud."
"The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."
"A possible improvement could be to give the capability to use different profiles for each AppNode when an application is deployed on an AppSpace."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Though it is a stable product, if we have an issue with the product, it gets difficult, and it gets really difficult to explain the issue to the support team. Also, it takes a long time to get resolved."
"There are multiple plugins which increase the number of product installations."
"The container-based image is too large and this makes auto-scaling difficult."
"Its price can be improved. For medium enterprises, it is a very expensive tool. In the market, you won't get many resources for this solution. You won't find many developers in the market very easily. The latest version of TIBCO (6.4 or 6.x) is not very stable. It has got many issues. We have raised this with TIBCO, and they are taking a lot of time to come up with a fix, which is making us move away from this product. Some of the performance-tuning aspects are also missing in version 6. They should provide performance-related fixes, which will be helpful for the customers. If you are migrating from the current version to the container-supported version, it is quite expensive. The product has evolved, but it is very pricey. That's one of the challenges. They have provided all the features that are there in other products, but this is a platform upgrade. The platform has completely been changed from 5.x to 6.x, and we can't use the same environment. We can't run both versions on the same server as VM. The development environment is entirely different. In version 5.x, there was a proprietary designer. Now, it has common plug-ins developed on top of Eclipse."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"I would like the solution to be integrated into the cloud."
SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews while TIBCO BusinessWorks is ranked 18th in Data Integration with 23 reviews. SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2, while TIBCO BusinessWorks is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO BusinessWorks writes "Reliable integration solution with robust communication capabilities and good scalability". SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, webMethods Integration Server, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services and Informatica PowerCenter, whereas TIBCO BusinessWorks is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Mule Anypoint Platform, Spring Cloud Data Flow, Confluent and IBM App Connect. See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. TIBCO BusinessWorks report.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.