We performed a comparison between SCOM and TruView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The most valuable feature is the extensibility, as there are really no limits as to what you can do with it."
"The product has helped our organization with in-depth monitoring."
"Availability monitoring is the feature I have found most valuable, as well as the capacity and ability to send notifications."
"The advantages of SCOM are that it is definitely user friendly and a more appropriate solution for what we need."
"The ease of deployment, especially on Windows platforms, is valuable."
"I enjoy its integration with the Microsoft Active Directory functions, which means users, computers, or other group policies can connect with Windows Active Directory."
"The most valuable features for us are the monitoring, the health explorer, and the console."
"They have great integration with the active directory."
"The most valuable feature for us was the ability to monitor sites and get a nice overview of all the data in a single view."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"All of the areas of reporting are very bad and need to be improved."
"The dashboard features are not user-friendly for our management team, only for the technical department."
"SCOM's feature that notifies us when a server is down is not present in recent updates, which has weakened the product."
"The end-user components, including the dashboards, the administration console, and the web console, need to be improved."
"Of course, price is always an issue with Microsoft and could be improved."
"I would like to see them improve their network monitoring."
"There could be more integration of SIM in the solution."
"I would like to see better support for monitoring Unix-based systems."
"One area that could be improved is the reporting features. In the version transformation from ten to eleven, the platform changed from a Windows-based platform to a Linux-based platform. As a result, the previous reporting feature using Crystal Reports was no longer available. Instead, we had to generate PDF dashboard reports, which were not as flexible."
SCOM is ranked 11th in Network Monitoring Software with 77 reviews while TruView is ranked 54th in Network Monitoring Software with 16 reviews. SCOM is rated 7.8, while TruView is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of SCOM writes "Has a good reporting engine, but its monitoring of the cloud-based environment could be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TruView writes "We lacked visibility into network and app performance, so we chose Visual TruView to proactively manage our network". SCOM is most compared with Zabbix, Dynatrace, Datadog, AppDynamics and Nagios XI, whereas TruView is most compared with NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and Softinventive Lab Total Network Monitor.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.