Compare ServiceNow Security Operations vs. ThreatQ

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use ThreatQ? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The solution is available over the cloud and is easy to manage.""My favorite feature is the application vulnerability scanner."

More ServiceNow Security Operations Pros »

"The reporting services are great. With reporting services, if you have customers that just visit a URL you can see the result - including why it's blocked and how and how the URL was first recognized as malicious."

More ThreatQ Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs to make customization easier. You cannot do much customization immediately. It requires an extensive workload. If the customization process was user-friendly, it would be much better.""The threat intelligence module needs a better dashboard.""They should stick to the roadmap and continue to build plugins and integrations with other third parties, enhance the UI, and enhance the reporting. It's all good. They should just continue enhancing the releases."

More ServiceNow Security Operations Cons »

"The solution should be simpler for the end-user in terms of reporting and navigating the product."

More ThreatQ Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"This product is a good value for the money."

More ServiceNow Security Operations Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) solutions are best for your needs.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
4,960
Comparisons
3,444
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
479
Rating
9.0
Views
1,314
Comparisons
1,013
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
767
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Learn
ServiceNow
ThreatQuotient
Video Not Available
Overview

ServiceNow Security Operations is an Enterprise Security Response engine offering security incident response, vulnerability response, and threat intelligence. It’s built on the intelligent workflows, automation, orchestration, and deep connection with IT of the ServiceNow platform.

ThreatQ is a Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) designed to enable threat operations and management. ThreatQ is the only solution with an integrated Threat Library, Adaptive Workbench and Open Exchange that help you to act upon the most relevant threats facing your organization and to get more out of your existing security infrastructure.

Offer
Learn more about ServiceNow Security Operations
Learn more about ThreatQ
Sample Customers
DXC Technology, Freedom Security Alliance, Prime Therapeutics, Seton Hall University, York Risk ServicesRadar, Bitdefender, Crowdstrike, FireEye, IBM Security
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider16%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm10%
Real Estate/Law Firm6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Critical Start, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR). Updated: January 2021.
457,459 professionals have used our research since 2012.

ServiceNow Security Operations is ranked 6th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 3 reviews while ThreatQ is ranked 10th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 1 review. ServiceNow Security Operations is rated 9.0, while ThreatQ is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ServiceNow Security Operations writes "SN SecOps offers a great set of features to better ingest information from Detection, SIEM, Vulnerability, and Threat Intelligent apps to better manage SecOps and ITSM". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatQ writes "Good reporting and pretty stable but needs to be simpler to use". ServiceNow Security Operations is most compared with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, Splunk Phantom, IBM Resilient, Proofpoint Threat Response and Swimlane, whereas ThreatQ is most compared with ThreatConnect, Recorded Future, IntSights, ReversingLabs Titanium Platform and EclecticIQ.

See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.

We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.