Anonymous UserSolutions Consultant at a comms service provider
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This is a cost-effective solution compared to other vendors, such as Cisco."
"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"It is not cheap."
"We paid for a two-year FullGuard license that includes support."
"It's not an expensive product."
"I am not happy with the pricing, it could be better."
"I had an issue when I was trying to stop a user from using too much bandwidth while I was using Azure, I was not able to stop them."
"We pay for licensing the solution. It's my understanding that it is not overly expensive. It may be somewhere around $2,000 for a license."
Earn 20 points
Sophos Cyberoam UTM is ranked 6th in Unified Threat Management (UTM) with 19 reviews while Trustwave Next Generation Firewall is ranked 34th in Firewalls. Sophos Cyberoam UTM is rated 7.4, while Trustwave Next Generation Firewall is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Sophos Cyberoam UTM writes "Useful data quota features, but scalability is an issue and the signature database could be enhanced". On the other hand, Sophos Cyberoam UTM is most compared with Sophos XG, Fortinet FortiGate, Sophos UTM, Cisco ASA Firewall and pfSense, whereas Trustwave Next Generation Firewall is most compared with FireEye Network Security, Fortinet FortiGate and Kerio Control.
See our list of .
We monitor all Unified Threat Management (UTM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.