Klocwork Previous Solutions
SF
reviewer2180745
Principle engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
We used Helix QAC and LDRA. We decided to use Klocwork because we had a good relationship with the vendor. We were already using it in our normal development environment, and we wanted to take up the preferred activity. The idea was to do both with the same tool. The sub-team was already learning Klocwork, so it made sense for the entire organization to have one product instead of using multiple solutions.
View full review »RE
Riham Elkomy
Principal Software Engineer at Valeo
I've also used Polyspace. Klocwork is cheaper. However, we do use the Code Prover feature from Polyspace. Klocwork only works statically. Polyspace's Code Prover actually runs the code so when it finds a problem, it's actually a problem. The issue is that it takes a lot of time to set up and is much harder. Therefore, we use a combination of both solutions. We use Klocwork for all our code and Polyspace for areas that require more quality standards.
View full review »BD
Bob Dean
Principle Engineer at MTSI
I previously used David Wheeler's Flawfinder. I still use it for sanity checks, but it has a 70% to 80% false positive rate.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Klocwork
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Klocwork. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
MG
Real Klocwork User
TMS Product Architect with 10,001+ employees
Where I worked previously we used SonarQube. I have also used the Microsoft standard rule set by Visual Studio.
View full review »JK
reviewer937347
Sr. Test Engineering Manager - Embedded Linux SW / RF at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees
I have previously used Apple Xcode and Microsoft Visual Studio static code analysis and then JetBrains ReSharper type of the code analysis from the third-party tool, which is much cheaper than the Klocwork. Additionally, they are faster. I do not think we will be using Klocwork for much longer.
RD
reviewer988890
VP Delivery & Customer Success at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
We used Coverity in the past, but they shifted their focus, and we switched to Klocwork.
View full review »I previously used PC-lint. I switched because KW is more mature.
View full review »We were using QAC and Klocwork at my previous company. At my current organization, we use Polyspace.
View full review »AS
reviewer1553658
Senior Product Specialist at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
I used Kiuwan earlier, but I used it for open source. It was primarily to find open sources in our entire source code. It supports modern languages. It has more languages than Klocwork.
View full review »SW
Sivanesh Waran
Sr. Software Solution Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt Ltd at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
We were using three Open Source static analyzers and faced lots of false-positives and false-negatives. Klocwork has given us better results with real issues.
View full review »RA
Ravi
Software Solutions Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
I evaluated some other tools, but I don't want to reveal the names of these tools. I didn't find them as good tools when compared with Klocwork.
View full review »RA
Ravi
Software Solutions Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.
I didn't use any tools other than Klocwork.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Klocwork
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Klocwork. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.