In the past, we used Airtight and Arista for our network solutions. We had to contact Mojo's technical support. It took several follow-ups to get a resolution. This is the reason we switched to Juniper.

We evaluated a lot of them. We put in a RFP and then weighted the different products: Cisco, Ruckus, Aerohive, Aruba, and Mojo. They were the five that competed against each other, and gave us demonstrations, and of course, gave us a price. When we evaluated everything, Mojo came on top, I believe, in almost in every category.

We evaluated Aruba and Cisco systems.

We also evaluated Aruba Wireless.

We looked at Aerohive, Ruckus, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and Cisco.

Before Mojo, we used Juniper Networks who was our primary choice for WiFi resale and professional services. When we started out with our managed services packages, we did not have another vendor whom we had already used. Therefore, it was a choice of which one is the best choice. We potentially looked at Aerohive and Meraki as alternatives (probably more Meraki than anybody else), because of their presence in the market.

It came down that Mojo's features were better for us and the pricing was good. As they have become more publicly visible in the market, it has worked out great. Mojo has become more visible, and that has worked out for us. If it turned out they had not become more visible, it is possible we would have switched to another vendor.

So, it has been perfect. Mojo has become hot in the market. People like them. They are winning a lot of deals. This is good for us, as it makes us look like we are not going out on a limb with these guys. It helps us makes our case, when they are doing well.

We looked at similar solutions from Meraki and Aerohive but found Mojo performed significantly better and offered significant value to our customers.

We are currently looking to switch over to a different wireless LAN solution.

After using Mojo, I have evaluated HP Aruba. It was a really nice solution as well. They offer a lot of flexibility when it comes to deployment architecture. Depending upon the size of your network, you could choose different options. They have an instant DP, functionality or, architecture that becomes economical because it doesn't require a special controller.

At the same time, if you are deploying a large network, they have hardware controllers as well. 

The only flipside for them is lack of functionality in Cloud managed wifi front. What I have seen is that the cloud-based Aruba Wi-Fi is not exactly as one would expect cloud Wi-Fi to be. I have seen Mist, which is now Juniper Mist, Cisco Meraki, and Arista Mojo, and when compared to the cloud offering of these competitors, it is the clinch in armor for Aruba. 

However, the lifetime warranty that they offer makes their devices very attractive.

It's moderately priced, and at the same time, it offers a lifetime warranty, which makes it a preferred solution.