Tricentis qTest Pricing
NM
NancyMcClanahan
Quality Assurance Team Lead at Parkview Health
For the 35 concurrent licenses, we pay something like $35,000 a year. There are no additional costs to the standard licensing fees, until we get into Tosca.
We have the Elite version, which allows us to have Insight, Parameters, Explorer Sessions, Pulse, Launch, and Flood.
View full review »For me, pricing for Tricentis qTest is moderate, so that's a five out of ten. It's more affordable than my company's previous solution, which was Micro Focus ALM.
RL
RobinaLaughlin
Assistant Vice President, IT Quality Assurance at Guardian Life Insurance
I have not looked at it recently, but our license price point is somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 a year. It's pretty low when you think about what we used to have. We haven't had any additional costs from Tricentis. We do the hosting on Amazon, so that's our cost.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis qTest. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
JK
JovanKangrga
Testing Lead Manager at PDC Energy
The price I was quoted is just under $60,000 for 30 licenses, annually, and that's with a 26.5 percent discount.
View full review »RV
Raja-Veeraraghavan
Automation Lead at LogiXML
We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support.
View full review »Based on whatever I heard, I can say that Tricentis qTest is a little costlier than other test management tools, like Jira, Zephyr, or Xray.
RO
RyanO'Neill
Sr. Manager Quality Assurance at Forcepoint LLC (Formerly Raytheon|Websense)
There is an upfront, yearly cost for concurrent licenses, meaning we're not limited to a specific number of users, only to a specific number of users online at a certain time. That works really well for us because we're a global organization. We'll have people online in San Diego, and those licenses then can be used later in the day by people online in Tel Aviv. It's been a really great licensing model for us.
I believe that there is a maintenance cost as well. I'm not really involved in the payment of that, so I don't really know what it would be.
View full review »VS
VSwaminathan
Product QA Manager at Reflexis Systems
It is pretty costly, from what I remember. It's quite a few times more costly than other tools on the market. We compared it to the other leading test management tools. We went for it because of the features and the value it could add to our organization.
View full review »DF
reviewer1215417
Senior Director of Quality Engineering at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We're paying a little over $1,000 for a concurrent license. One of the solutions we looked at was about half of that but that one is very much a bare-bones test management tool.
There are no additional costs. We pay a flat yearly rate for each license.
View full review »MS
reviewer1229907
Division Chief with 10,001+ employees
We're paying $19,000 a year right now for qTest, with 19 licenses. All the on-premise support is bundled into that.
View full review »MD
reviewer1219371
Manager, IT Quality Assurance (EDM/ITSRC/Infrastructure) at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
I believe we have an annual subscription.
View full review »I can't comment, I wasn't involved.
View full review »The pricing can be still competitive.
View full review »Buyer's Guide
Tricentis qTest
March 2024
Learn what your peers think about Tricentis qTest. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.