RabbitMQ Scalability Issues

Robert Herrick
Director - Information Technology at a transportation company with 51-200 employees
We have had no scalability issues at all. We have RabbitMQ servers behind a load balancer, with Queue listeners attached to them. I have estimated that we will be able to scale quite dramatically without any change to network topology. View full review »
SeniorSoabf3
Senior Software Specialist at a security firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
It works as expected, i.e., flawless. View full review »
Mustafa İleri
Principal Software Engineer at a tech company with 501-1,000 employees
I have not encountered any scalability issues either. View full review »
Keith Sohl
Senior Developer/Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We have not used the scalability features yet. View full review »
Julien Hayotte
Software architect & back-end engineer at a tech services company
There were no scalability issues. View full review »
MidLevel24cf
Mid Level Software Engineer at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Its really easy to scale. View full review »
GraduateTA901
Graduate Teaching Assistant at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
It would be nice if it could produce automatic load balancing when the number of brokers scales up. View full review »
Van Nguyen
Senior Software Engineer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees
There were no specific issues with scalability except the issue of adding a new node to the cluster. View full review »
AndrewFerguson
Software Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
PCF allows us to scale the consumers. View full review »
Developmeb7c
Development Lead - Java/Hybris with 10,001+ employees
We were able to operate multiple nodes and we implemented a load balancer to meet our high traffic requirements. View full review »
Boris Levin
Head of Data & Infrastructure at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We had multiple issues with scalability. The product's scalability is rather problematic. It tends to be very complex to maintain with various sharding and high availability options. View full review »
VpOfSoftb75e
VP of Software at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees
For the most part the product was very scalable. The only times we would have problems were usually related to Amazon hiccups that would cause the cluster to slow down. View full review »
ResearchAsst939
Research Assistant at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
Didn’t have issues. View full review »
Solution44bd
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
There were no scalability issues. View full review »
Softwareace4
Software Engineer at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees
There were some scalability issues. There is no scalable queue. The cluster only supports redirections. View full review »
Jay Sardhara
Full Stack Developer Intern at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We did not encounter any scalability issues. View full review »
Andrew-Ferguson
Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
We have not had scalability issues. View full review »
ThomasS346
Senior Application Developer at a software R&D company with 51-200 employees
We had no issues with stability. Exactly the opposite! It actually blew me away how flexible a framework it is. It’s a very elegant solution. View full review »
Todd Outten
Founder Partner and CTO at Rogue Startup
We have not encountered any scalability issues. View full review »
Nikola Tzaprev
Head of Cloud Platform Development at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
We did not have any scalability problems. View full review »
Presidenf9d6
President, Applications and Security Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
We did not encounter any scalability issues. View full review »
Shashidhar Kondra
Technical Manager with 501-1,000 employees
There were no scalability issues as such. The scalability was fine. View full review »

Sign Up with Email