VMware Workstation has good stability.

The stability of the solution is great. I have not had any customers with issues, apart from the day-zero incidents, which happened to everyone, whether you are Microsoft, VMware, or anyone else. Other than that, we have not experienced any major core stability issues.

I rate VMware Workstation's stability a ten out of ten. 

I haven't had any stability issues. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

VMware Workstation is stable.

VMware Workstation is highly stable. I have been running a VM for a year and a half and nothing has happened with it. It is running very well.

I rate the stability of VMware Workstation a ten out of ten,

VMware Workstation's performance is excellent.

We haven't encountered any technical difficulties with VMware Workstation so far.

I rate the product’s stability a nine out of ten.

VMware Workstation is a stable solution.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give stability a ten.

They're very stable. VMware is remarkable in this regard. Given how well it works, I think that it's insane that people are doing it any other way.

I ran a miner in Windows directly, and it would occupy all of the cores and slow down the computer and cause a ton of problems. Interestingly, it wouldn't yield as much as this virtualized Linux system would in Windows, on the same machine.

I'm not sure how it makes sense that a virtualized machine inside Windows works better than something where you eliminate the middle man and you just run it in Windows, but that's exactly the case.

When you run these virtualized systems, they're running on bare iron, pretty much. They may be in Windows, and Windows might be using other stuff, but they're going to the CPU and saying, "This one, this one, this one, this one is mine," and it just runs.

This means that you get all of the performance advantages of Linux, and none of the overhead of Microsoft spying on you. This is why I think that building every computer out there as a baseline virtualized machine makes a lot more sense. You just press a button on your keyboard, and there's your Windows. Press another one, there's your Mac. Press another one, there's your Linux. Have them all be able to swap files back and forth, and everybody could be having the best of all possible worlds for whatever kind of system they want. Ultimately, Linux would grow and win out.

However, as it is, you give them a bunch of money and they tend to develop theirs a little faster. Linux may be the best system in terms of efficiencies because it's monetized to do so. All of those companies with all Linux servers know that by cutting away the fat, they make the thing work better and they earn more money with the hardware they've spent so much money on. That's the financial incentive.

The tool’s stability is good.

There are some concerns regarding the stability of this solution. We have a device that seems to be under some pressure and two others that are working very well.

The solution handles pretty well. It did seem to function a little bit better than I had expected.

The stability of the solution depends on the solution's license. If you opt for a license purchased from VMware Workstation, then it remains very stable. The unlicensed version of the solution is not very suitable or stable.

The stability is good.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

The stability is fine.

The product is stable.

I rate VMware Workstation ten out of ten for stability.

It is not a very stable solution. I rate the stability a six out of ten. 

VMware Workstation is a stable solution when compared to all the other hypervisors in the market. Snapshots, rollback and forth etc works smoothly. However, I do not have extended experience with the other solutions

I have encountered stability issues with the virtual networks and have had run into issue with copying or moving VMs. Usually these all work great 9 out of 10 times, but when it doesn't work right it become very time consuming to fix and troubleshoot.

VMware Workstation is a stable solution.

It is quite a stable solution.

I have had a few issues prior to update1 - but I am unsure if this is due to my platform or if it is a VMware related issue. I also noticed that it uses a lot of RAM when running multiple instances of Windows VMs. Update - I have 32GB RAM now and it works flawlessly. I have been working in this newer environment for several months and I couldn't be more pleased.

The product is very stable. I rate its stability an eight out of ten.

It is a stable product.

VMware Workstation is highly reliable and stable.

Workstation is stable and scalable. 

The solution is stable, we haven't had any issues.

I've been hit with a few bugs and documented issues.Specifically with video not behaving for VM windows on multiple monitors. And shared printing from the host machine is very temperamental.

In v6, it was a 32bit environment with a maximum memory of 4Gb RAM. Therefore, this required a high level of swap out of RAM to disk in order to provide sufficient memory space to run VMs, this occasionally caused system crashes. Since v8 this has not been an issue.