We performed a comparison between Original Software Qualify, Sauce Labs, and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Atlassian, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites."Flexible software with multiple functions, e.g. scenario deployment, new entity creation, workflow creation, etc. Technical support for this software is very good."
"Easy to integrate with the other platform for tracking purposes."
"Since this is an all-in-one testing site, we are able to take advantage of the browser OS combinations, mobile emulators and simulators, and real mobile devices. This is important to us since we have a variety of users, browsers, OS, etc."
"One of the most valuable features is that we do not have to have the cross-platform testing vehicles in-house. Sauce Labs gives us the ability to test across platforms and that really helps give us confidence in our products."
"Our machines are mostly Windows. Being able to test with Safari, on a Mac, and other types of browser pieces without having to manage all the infrastructure is the biggest feature that our team enjoys."
"I like the dashboard and seeing the test results. As a manager, I like to see the insights of the people using it, understanding the total path and run. I can see all of that as a manager. I also know team members love seeing the dashboard and seeing the test results in real-time."
"The most valuable feature is the cross-browser feature, it has many android and iOS devices both simulators and real devices. It's easy to integrate. I also like video recording too."
"Allows us to do JIRA Cloud and BambooHR Integration."
"It runs on the cloud, so you don't have physical setups to run all of this."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"The whole suite is made for .NET development."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"The initial setup is easy. It's easy to configure."
"I was satisfied with the support given by customer service."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"The reporting engine of Original Software Qualify AQM needs to change. It's very difficult to develop complex reports. Its reporting function needs improvement."
"The real concern is the load time of applications or real devices when we start our tests. It takes some time to load the application or web browser. Sometimes, it is frustrating too. Since they are real devices, we understand it takes some time to load. However, if it were to improve, then that would be a great asset to the solution. So, we would like better responsive times when opening applications and running tests."
"User account management needs an overhauls, allowing for user groups rather than just a hierarchy structure."
"The only drawback is the speed, it will be good if we have a server in Asia too. It will be great if we can improve speed while initialization and execution."
"The ability to install profiles on iOS real mobile devices should be included."
"I may not know what should be improved on the platform, but I think it could offer a greater variety of testing solutions. I know there might be competing solutions that cover more things I'm unaware of, and it could expand a bit more. We've done a lot of automated testing scenarios, and that's all the rage these days, so I think Sauce Labs could look at potential ways to improve and cover other scenarios."
"The ability to configure the memory and CPU for the test machines should be included."
"Sauce Labs has room for improvement with its price point. Using a real mobile device, and having that dedicated to your team, costs more than actually purchasing a mobile device. We haven't tried the real devices yet. This is because of their price point."
"As a web product QA team, we sometimes need to spot check some new child site on multiple browsers and OS(es). It was a little time consuming for us since we need to click on each of the browser/OS combinations and start a new session to test. Every sprint, with new features and child pages being added, we mostly need to do the same steps over and over again."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"The solution should be cheaper."
"It could be available for multiple platforms and other operating systems like Mac with a native port."
"The price could be improved."
"The interface should be made attractive."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
