Original Software Qualify Competitors and Alternatives
The top Original Software Qualify competitors are
Read reviews of Original Software Qualify competitors and alternatives
Neotys
Aug 24 2017
What do you think of Neotys NeoLoad?
Valuable Features There are several key features, including Jenkins integration, infrastructure monitoring, and results analysis. • Improvements to My Organization Implementing this product has allowed us to increase the number of projects that get load testing, and the frequency by which we re-test our performance. • Room for Improvement It needs improvements in the UI. It's currently not as friendly as it should be. • Use of Solution We've used it for seven years. • Deployment Issues We haven't had any issues with deployment. • Stability Issues We have never experienced any isuses with stability. • Scalability Issues The product has scaled very well up until this point. • Customer Service and Technical Support The support from Neotys is very good....1 comment
Micro Focus
Real User
Lead Performance Architect at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Nov 21 2016
What is most valuable?
JMeter script integration. This integration feature is a good approach provided by HPE. Sometimes, we need to run scripts developed in an open source tool like JMeter. Instead of spending time on creating new scripts, the scripts developed in JMeter can be uploaded and based on the protocol license because it is a DEV user protocol, it provides a valuable... more»What needs improvement?
Monitoring and sample access to servers needs to be provided, so that we can explore this and keep up-to-date. The licensed version / free edition needs to be configured with SiteScope or AppDynamics, which many customers might not have. The LoadRunner feature of Windows Resource Monitor should come in handy in such scenarios. It is not only for Windows-based... more»Micro Focus
Nov 04 2016
What is most valuable?
What I really like is our team's core competence in building good tests that really do find issues, because of our full-time dedication to it. We have Performance Center as a platform to share with others that don't do performance testing... more»How has it helped my organization?
It allows us to on the reporting end show how even though we don't have a smoking gun on this release, and it made everything so terrible that we've got real quality issues, we know when it started and that it's only getting worse. When... more»What needs improvement?
I know there are integrations with continuous testing. It's got tie-ins to some of the newer tools to allow continuous testing. I'd love to see us not have to customize it, but for it to be out of the box. I have some concern over its... more»
Akamai
Aug 25 2017
What is most valuable?
Soasta CloudTest is an integral part of our performance testing strategy and key in generating load across geography. This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic... more»How has it helped my organization?
Before moving to Soasta CloudTest, we had a performance testing tool deployed on-premise environment. Other than high licensing cost, this tool has limitation in simulating real user experience to generate load in different geographies,... more»What needs improvement?
One of the challenges with Soasta is availability and quick access to their technical support documentation and on-call support. Hence, it was a challenge to acquire knowledge during tool adoption stage. Soasta CloudTest is a cloud hosted... more»
Sep 25 2017
What is most valuable?
To me as we have used most of the MQ stub," MQ recording" is the best useful feature i would say -because of its flexibility to configure various MQ recording methods as per the implementation and "pass through"feature too.How has it helped my organization?
The tool is helping us to build various virtual services for various middle layer components: MQ, REST, and SOAP services. Using service virtualization, we are able to accelerate the testing and development activity. Without SV, integration... more»What needs improvement?
As per my working experience over the last three and half years with RIT/RTVS, I would consider two following areas of improvement: * Reporting, in the recent release of RCPT, "Usage graph" feature is included, but that still needs... more»Micro Focus
Jun 13 2017
What do you think of LoadRunner?
Valuable Features The capabilities and flexibility of the Controller, the ability to monitor the systems under test, and the comprehensive results Analysis which saves a great deal of time. • Room for Improvement More guidance on the use of the Tru Client protocol which is used for Web interfaces. • Use of Solution 15 years • Deployment Issues LoadRunner generally deploys without issues. • Stability Issues Its a complex product and there are usually a few bugs in the point zero releases, it is generally pretty reliable. Sometimes the controller can crash, this is usually after opening and closing several scenarios without closing the controller. Closing the controller after a couple of scenarios opened will avoid the problem. • Scalability Issues Scalability...BUYER'S GUIDE
Not sure which Performance Testing Tools solution is right for you?Download our free Performance Testing Tools Report and find out what your peers are saying about Original Software, Micro Focus, IBM, and more!
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 19000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 19000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.