Apache Kafka Previous Solutions

Michael Silvi
Senior Software Engineering Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
No, we did you use a previous messaging system. View full review »
Sean Hickey
Solutions Architect at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
We used traditional message queues and file semaphores. There was a lot of overhead with asynchronous messages being put into an order and making sure nothing got dropped. It required a lot of code and maintenance. View full review »
Kevin Quon
Technical Architect at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We did not have any other previous solutions. Our project was green field and a new type of project development. View full review »
FounderC32bc
Founder, CEO at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
We didn’t have a previous solution. We started with Kafka and then switched to Amazon Kinesis (PaaS for Kafka). I think Microsoft Azure also released a competing service. View full review »
HeadOfEn9a94
Head of Engineering
The previous solution was not really an equivalent one. I have been using several messaging systems, but Kafka fits us better for a more scalable system. View full review »
Ivan Dyachkov
Team Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We used RabbitMQ before. It does not scale well. View full review »
JavaDeve0c6d
Java Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees
I think performance-wise, the product is very good and fits in our use case. We used other distributed message queues, but all products have their own use case View full review »
kafkakid
Lead Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
We switched from a previous solution mainly to reduce costs and to have a more scalable solution. View full review »
VINOD K KUMARAN
Technical Lead/Project Manager(Consulting Apple Inc) at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We were using ActiveMQ, which is just a messaging system. We are changing because of Kafka’s added value of scalability, retention, and high payload support. View full review »
Chandra Keerthy
Principal Software Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Kafka rendered itself suitable for our product offering. It supports all the necessary requirements for a real-time pipeline. View full review »
Dori Waldman
Big Data Lead at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees
I used RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ. Kafka is the standard, so there is no question what to use (unless you need better performance, like in ZeroMQ). View full review »
SeniorJa44a7
Senior Java Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We started to use Apache Kafka with our application from scratch. View full review »
Jyothish Kalavoor Parambil
Hadoop Technical Lead (Assistant Consultant) at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
For big data, we did not have a previous solution. I have used Microsoft MQ for building traditional systems. View full review »
Mehul Jani
Deputy General Manager, DevOps Manager at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees
We previously used rsync, which was not real-time. View full review »
Enterpri157e
Enterprise Architect at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Apache MQ is different. It is a message bus (log rotate) than can manage more than 10,000 events/sec. View full review »

Sign Up with Email