Choose a specific buying criteria from the list and see what real users have to say about it.

Apache Kafka Previous Solutions

Fbc6d212 93a9 4393 a7b1 de1e33e98003 avatar
Hadoop Technical Lead (Assistant Consultant) at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
For big data, we did not have a previous solution. I have used Microsoft MQ for building traditional systems. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Senior Java Consultant at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
We started to use Apache Kafka with our application from scratch. view full review »
294bf53a 7050 4633 bd52 249f8c4d01d7 avatar
Senior Software Engineering Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
No, we did you use a previous messaging system. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Founder, CEO at a tech vendor with 1-10 employees
We didn’t have a previous solution. We started with Kafka and then switched to Amazon Kinesis (PaaS for Kafka). I think Microsoft Azure also released a competing service. view full review »
B94acfff c187 47f3 a11a 2f35bba4f243 avatar
Solutions Architect at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
We used traditional message queues and file semaphores. There was a lot of overhead with asynchronous messages being put into an order and making sure nothing got dropped. It required a lot of code and maintenance. view full review »
D8cacc50 c74a 4062 b407 94a51a8ca547 avatar
Principal Software Architect at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Kafka rendered itself suitable for our product offering. It supports all the necessary requirements for a real-time pipeline. view full review »
96d1f61b 88f4 4be7 bf9e e3ce6b7d6f17 avatar
Team Lead at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
We used RabbitMQ before. It does not scale well. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Head of Engineering
The previous solution was not really an equivalent one. I have been using several messaging systems, but Kafka fits us better for a more scalable system. view full review »
50918253 dfac 4b79 a431 4fe711a85fff avatar
Deputy General Manager, DevOps Manager at a tech services company
We previously used rsync, which was not real-time. view full review »
D94612f3 2860 4f98 8b91 b334119e0435 avatar
Big Data Lead at a marketing services firm with 51-200 employees
I used RabbitMQ and ActiveMQ. Kafka is the standard, so there is no question what to use (unless you need better performance, like in ZeroMQ). view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Enterprise Architect at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Apache MQ is different. It is a message bus (log rotate) than can manage more than 10,000 events/sec. view full review »
98daa8e2 c94b 4886 a904 8eece49fd0de avatar
Technical Lead/Project Manager(Consulting Apple Inc) at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
We were using ActiveMQ, which is just a messaging system. We are changing because of Kafka’s added value of scalability, retention, and high payload support. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Lead Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
We switched from a previous solution mainly to reduce costs and to have a more scalable solution. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Java Developer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I think performance-wise, the product is very good and fits in our use case. We used other distributed message queues, but all products have their own use case view full review »
868fac92 ebf8 4953 a45c b94dc0d0ab3f avatar
Technical Architect at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We did not have any other previous solutions. Our project was green field and a new type of project development. view full review »

Sign Up with Email