Choose a specific buying criteria from the list and see what real users have to say about it.

Apache Kafka Previous Solutions

50918253 dfac 4b79 a431 4fe711a85fff avatar
Deputy General Manager, DevOps Manager at a tech services company
We previously used rsync, which was not real-time. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Enterprise Architect at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Apache MQ is different. It is a message bus (log rotate) than can manage more than 10,000 events/sec. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Technical Lead/Project Manager (Consulting Apple Inc) at a tech services company
We were using ActiveMQ, which is just a messaging system. We are changing because of Kafka’s added value of scalability, retention, and high payload support. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Lead Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
We switched from a previous solution mainly to reduce costs and to have a more scalable solution. view full review »
Anonymous avatar x60
Java Developer at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
I think performance-wise, the product is very good and fits in our use case. We used other distributed message queues, but all products have their own use case view full review »
868fac92 ebf8 4953 a45c b94dc0d0ab3f avatar
Technical Architect at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
We did not have any other previous solutions. Our project was green field and a new type of project development. view full review »

Sign Up with Email