We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and Pega Robotic Process Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The UI is user-friendly and ABBYY Vantage supports over 100 languages."
"Identifies and extract relevant elements from a document."
"The ability to extract and insert data, then structuralize it into the actionable format, would be the most valuable."
"It saves us a lot of manual work."
"Abbyy is really good in terms of reading OCR."
"The OTR (Optical Text Recognition) is the most valuable feature of this solution."
"ABBYY Vantage has been designed as a user-friendly solution, making the setup process require only a couple of days."
"Verification Station is valuable."
"If you want to make any kind of base automation, you can easily code exactly what you want."
"The solution's automation handling capability has positively impacted the overall automation process in my experience."
"The most valuable features are the loops to lookup tables to read the data."
"They are leaders in the same industry."
"It helped cut short the release cycle by almost 40% compared to the previous solution."
"Its stability has been good."
"The tech support is highly available and there is plenty of online training available."
"User-friendly, easy to understand and has many features including the ability to track."
"It would be good if the product provided an AI-based prebuilt model that predicts and gives output."
"In IRISXtract, we can have master data, and we can set the master data. There are more options for taking any data and comparing it with master data. For a project, they have a dump from SAP for validation. This feature is there in ABBYY, but it is not extensive like IRISXtract. ABBYY is capturing the data, but there are not a lot of options to validate the captured data. It would be helpful if there are more options for validating the captured data in ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"I think that technical support should help instead of developing a solution from scratch every time you reach out to them."
"The solution needs more web or cloud-based development."
"Their tutorials are not enough. They can improve the tutorials and maybe add more examples in their tutorials. Currently, if you want to learn ABBYY technology, it is very difficult. There are just a few resources, such as YouTube channels and blogs. There are not many resources for learning ABBYY."
"The integration with UiPath is not good. I would like to see more documentation and guides to help gain more in-depth knowledge of how to use ABBYY FlexiCapture."
"They say that they have invoice training or document training where if you put in a certain number of documents of the same type and you fix it once, twice, or a few times, it'll automatically be able to read the same document perfectly without you having to create a layout for it to follow. That has never worked properly for any project, so I just stopped recommending it completely. We spent time trying to test and getting a bunch of invoices to test it with, and in the end, it just didn't do what it needed to. If they fix that or if they can improve on that, that would be great. It will save a lot of time for a lot of people, and it will allow people with less experience with ABBYY to be able to use it."
"Machine learning needs to be improved."
"I would like to improve the tool's integration features and stability."
"The way integration classes are created could be improved."
"There have been some scenarios where the bot was not able to replace some of the controls and could not recognize and personalize the task we wanted to automate."
"I would like to see an enhanced auditing feature included."
"In Pega, the UI has to be improved because that is the most challenging area that most of our customers ask for because we have to depend on some other React JS or some other tool to bring that kind of UI experience. So, there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of UI and UX."
"The development experience needs to be improved."
"The orchestration needs to be better."
"The new players such as UiPath and ABBYY are moving very quickly, but Pega is not. I'd definitely like to see Pega doing a few more interesting things on the AI or machine learning front so that we can use the platform for multiple things."
More Pega Robotic Process Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 9th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews while Pega Robotic Process Automation is ranked 10th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 12 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while Pega Robotic Process Automation is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "An easy-to-use solution with good ICR and OCR capabilities, but needs more connectors and advanced workflows and better stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega Robotic Process Automation writes "Great for UI creation, helpful support services, and reliable". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, OpenText Intelligent Capture and HyperScience, whereas Pega Robotic Process Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Pega CRM. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.