We performed a comparison between ABBYY Vantage and Pega Robotic Process Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a very useful and user-friendly product."
"The advantage of this tool is that it is a proven product. A lot of other products are quite new in the market."
"The ability to extract and insert data, then structuralize it into the actionable format, would be the most valuable."
"ABBYY Vantage has reduced our data because it can classify and extract information from documents."
"The solution responds well to automatic document classifications with a 90% success rate."
"While using ABBYY FlexiCapture we did not use the generic models that they do have for invoice and purchase orders. For one of the use-cases, the document was exactly the purchase order, but we are not using that generic model. We are creating the model from Scratch. However, if I was to compare ABBYY FlexiCapture with other IA tools, the machine learning and how the extraction is done is far better than competitors. This allows a lot less effort for the development."
"The advantage for ABBYY Vantage is in the visual tools to parameterize and set documents."
"ABBYY Vantage has been designed as a user-friendly solution, making the setup process require only a couple of days."
"The most valuable feature of Pega Robotic Process Automation is the technique: you can create a user interface that can interact with a human being for attended robots."
"The low-code/no-code development aspect of the solution is great."
"The solution's ability to create adapters quickly is its most valuable feature."
"The most valuable aspect for myself was access to the .net framework. If I couldn't figure something out using the objects that they had provided, I could bring in the .net objects and do so using similar logic that I would in a .net or C sharp coding language. Having that familiarity was helpful."
"The most valuable features are the loops to lookup tables to read the data."
"It is a good and matured solution."
"It was very smooth and very seamless to create automations."
"Using the tool actually ends up teaching you about making workflows more efficient."
"There is an area of improvement. For example, when we read the data from the OCR, the accuracy is not good."
"This solution should have better integration with RPA solutions such as Blue Prism."
"The solution needs more web or cloud-based development."
"Even though the training works, it's not as good as it is made out to be."
"The initial setup was relatively complex. The people who install it must be knowledgeable about what they are doing."
"We would like the workflow building within this solution to be more transparent, which would allow us to model the process."
"ABBYY FlexiCapture could improve the performance. We are looking for better performance because it can be a lengthy capture process and the accuracy needs to be enhanced when it comes to Arabic."
"In the future, I would like to see integration with Google Sheets."
"Rule versioning and deployment to enable parallel development could still be improved"
"Pega Robotic Process Automation scalability is too low."
"What I don't like that much in Pega Robotic Process Automation is its monitoring tool because that tool is tightly connected with the platform. If the Pega team can deploy the monitoring tool separately, so that it's a separate solution altogether, then that would be good because currently, if you have to use the monitoring tool, then that means you have to use the Pega Robotic Process Automation platform. The initial setup for Pega Robotic Process Automation also needs improvement because it is complex. The only additional feature I'd like to see in the solution is for the monitoring tool to be a stand-alone rather than being tightly coupled with the Pega platform. Looking at the current features of Pega Robotic Process Automation concerning application automation, it covers most of my needs currently."
"There have been some scenarios where the bot was not able to replace some of the controls and could not recognize and personalize the task we wanted to automate."
"I would like to see an enhanced auditing feature included."
"You cannot use a two-dimensional array to read the data."
"In this modern world, in this automation space, if Pega could provide more options that are user-friendly and provide a way to quickly develop an automation solution that is drag-and-drop with a minimal coding approach, then it would be great for automation."
"The handwritten structured and semi-structured data recognition accuracy is much lower and is an area that definitely needs to improve."
More Pega Robotic Process Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
ABBYY Vantage is ranked 7th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 46 reviews while Pega Robotic Process Automation is ranked 9th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 22 reviews. ABBYY Vantage is rated 8.0, while Pega Robotic Process Automation is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ABBYY Vantage writes "Genius-level AI with very easy setup and implementation processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega Robotic Process Automation writes "Great for UI creation, helpful support services, and reliable". ABBYY Vantage is most compared with UiPath Document Understanding, UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, HyperScience and OpenText Intelligent Capture, whereas Pega Robotic Process Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Pega CRM. See our ABBYY Vantage vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors and best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
