We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and ARIS BPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"Objects can be reused across different BPMNs and processes, so we can design new processes quicker and easier."
"The EPC modeling is very detailed, the semantic check is helpful, and auto-layout simplifies the formatting."
"The ease of use is the most valuable. I have tried a number of BPMN packages, and I find the user interface of ARIS BPM easier and more intuitive than others. If your team is knowledgeable on BPMN, it is really pretty easy to figure out on your own because it adheres to the standards extremely well. I have tried Bizagi, BizFlow, and a variety of such solutions, and I just liked ARIS BPM better."
"The solution has come up with a web portal that makes it easy to model and show to clients."
"Visualizes processes which helps the business see pain points."
"The tool has good navigation."
"There is a really powerful reporting API that allows you to create almost any kind of report you want out of your process and document repository."
"It provides the discovery functionality, and you can have a simulation on top of it to get your design corrected to ensure that it is within the right state of parameters. It is a complete package that you can use from strategy to execution because you have the design layer, and within the design, you can also do analytics."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"The model graphics can be exported in PDF, but the model is too small to read."
"The tool needs to improve its support since they take long to respond."
"The governance mechanism could be better, as could automation."
"The interface is a little archaic."
"Its governance tool and integration with ESB and execution engine can be improved. Their partner support can also be improved."
"Making it more customizable and easy to learn would be a benefit."
"The pricing of the solution can be improved and the initial setup should be made easy."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and better designed."
AgilePoint is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while ARIS BPA is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while ARIS BPA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform and IBM BPM, whereas ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi. See our ARIS BPA vs. AgilePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
