We performed a comparison between Alfresco and Laserfiche Rio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."The product allows engineering teams and developers to introduce new things in a seamless and easy way."
"I like the ease of use, sections, and calendar."
"Document repository."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the searching elements of the metadata."
"This is a very complete and powerful solution."
"Metadata, auto class, disposition log, and legal hold."
"Alfresco has a very steep learning curve, and unfortunately, during the learning process, it's very easy to make errors, which often are unforgiving."
"I think the presentation layer could be improved - currently, it's too complex, and there are too many features cluttered all over the screen."
"I would like them to consider document capture functionality."
"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."
Earn 20 points
Alfresco is ranked 9th in Enterprise Content Management with 10 reviews while Laserfiche Rio is ranked 23rd in Enterprise Content Management. Alfresco is rated 8.0, while Laserfiche Rio is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Alfresco writes "Flexible and customizable but lacking integration with Microsoft". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Laserfiche Rio writes "A powerful solution that offers BPM and automation to assist with our digital transformation". Alfresco is most compared with SharePoint, Hyland OnBase, OpenText Documentum, IBM FileNet and OpenText Extended ECM, whereas Laserfiche Rio is most compared with SharePoint, DocuWare and OpenText eDOCS.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Document Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
