We performed a comparison between Appian and MEGA HOPEX based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."SAIL (Self-Assembling Interface Layer), a scripting language provided by Appian. It is the equivalent of JS and CSS. It allows creation of complex UIs which are also responsive. With SAIL, we have a single language for both the UI logic and its appearance. UI components can be built as reusable components and used in multiple UI interfaces."
"It's a stable product."
"Even with an on-premise implementation, the scalability is still high, so it is easy to scale up."
"With low-code, we don't need a lot of coding, and then from the plumbing perspective, there is a complete CI/CD pipeline that exists within Appian that can be leveraged for open deployment."
"The agile manner that we require to create our workflows. This is probably the most critical part of our solution and the time it takes to start processing the solution."
"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"The application life cycle is very clear. I started learning it and giving some workshops to my team. Creating the users and the building is very structured. Documentation is nice and it's easy to learn."
"Low code development: Code can be developed pretty quickly which leads to less turnaround time for automation of business processes."
"The solution itself was easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is that the software controls everything from a single management window."
"What's most valuable in MEGA HOPEX is that it follows the reference model where each component is defined. I also like the diagram consistency in MEGA HOPEX."
"The dashboard on the homepage makes for an enhanced view at a glance of the various work functions applicable to the user."
"The platform is stable."
"The solution is scalable. If a company needs to expand it, it's completely possible to do so."
"We have many use cases for this solution but the feature I have found most valuable is the IT Portfolio Management module."
"You do not need to be a professional of enterprise modeling to contribute to the enrichment and improvement of the enterprise repository."
"Authoring tool is slow to use resulted in limitations on how quickly solutions can be built."
"It would be useful if they could create an academy or forum in the future to help active users answer questions they have about the solution."
"It has it's own built-in UI components and doesn't provide much flexibility to customize or extend those components."
"The graphical user interface could be easier to use. It should be simplified."
"The product’s pricing could be improved from the developers' perspective."
"Appian could be improved by making it a strict, no-code platform with free-built process packs."
"The reporting is not as good as in similar products. They could also improve the dashboards."
"Appian could improve their customer-facing initiatives."
"This product is expensive and would be improved by lowering its price."
"In my experience, I've encountered difficulties with consuming custom packages in MEGA HOPEX, which leads to redundant work when deploying them to production. This is an area where improvement is needed. While version six offers better UI and UX, resolving this issue should be a priority. I believe it's important to fully explore MEGA HOPEX's capabilities before suggesting new ones."
"We have a very close relationship with MEGA representatives in Mexico, and we ask them why they don't offer impact analysis. For example, we have a server in the center and provide the client a view of what's in the peripheral area, like one cluster, application, process area, and services. We want to offer our clients that level of visibility with HOPEX."
"The product must improve integration with other tools."
"Needs a friendlier import/export to other modeling tools."
"It would be great if this solution could integrate with other tools such as ITSM (ServiceNow) or CMDB."
"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."
"The tool's UI should be more user-friendly."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while MEGA HOPEX is ranked 5th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 36 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while MEGA HOPEX is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MEGA HOPEX writes "Easy to use and robust with good features". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas MEGA HOPEX is most compared with Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, LeanIX, ARIS BPA, Avolution ABACUS and Visio.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.