We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and QPR ProcessDesigner based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design."The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the solution to fully customize the methodology according to the company's needs, and to enforce that methodology with features like filters, semantic checks, and reports."
"This solution has helped us in terms of discovering business processes."
"MFT is quite attractive. A large amount of data is passed in almost no time and it is quite easy to use."
"In general, the users really like it and they can get started using it very easily."
"The initial setup and installation are very straightforward."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"One of the many advantages of ARIS is that it is supported by a very strong BPM community, which is critical for us. Although it has been in business for many years, it is still at an early stage of evolution. There are so many instances where your specific use case or requirement for using ARIS hasn't necessarily been matured across the sector. So, you need access to a very active community to help you explore possible solutions and ways in which ARIS can be used to achieve those use cases."
"The solution is user-friendly and easy to expose."
"It makes communication easier due to transparency on processes."
"Processes become clearer, easier to understand, and easier to spot in development areas."
"The pricing of the solution can be improved and the initial setup should be made easy."
"Since this is a design tool, seamless interface to make the process flows executable."
"The governance mechanism could be better, as could automation."
"End-to-end visibility and real-time are areas that will need greater attention."
"I could use more icons and other graphical elements."
"The integration between ARIS, webMethods, and project versions needs improvement."
"There should be a more intuitive tool when creating reports."
"One thing that could be improved is regarding the handling of the content itself. Maybe ARIS could provide a set of best practices, or best processes, so that people do not have to start from scratch."
"There is definitely a need to produce models in XML. There is already something available, but it seems that transferring between the different modelling tools is difficult."
Earn 20 points
ARIS BPA is ranked 3rd in Business Process Design with 64 reviews while QPR ProcessDesigner is ranked 25th in Business Process Design. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while QPR ProcessDesigner is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QPR ProcessDesigner writes "FactView was easy to use and integrate". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas QPR ProcessDesigner is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
