Compare Asana vs. JIRA Portfolio

Asana is ranked 5th in Project Management Software with 2 reviews while JIRA Portfolio is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools with 10 reviews. Asana is rated 10.0, while JIRA Portfolio is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Promotes collaboration, improves efficiency, and helps to make tedious tasks more fun". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JIRA Portfolio writes "Makes it easy to collaborate but needs better integration with other tools ". Asana is most compared with Monday.com, Wrike and Smartsheet, whereas JIRA Portfolio is most compared with Microsoft Project Server, Smartsheet and Planview Enterprise One.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Asana Logo
2,628 views|2,311 comparisons
JIRA Portfolio Logo
2,923 views|1,831 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
By using this software, I have adaptability in my work, and it can improve the production of our company.I love the way it monitors all of the current and past projects, and it sends notifications to keep everything on the track.

Read more »

The customized workflows we can define are very valuable. JIRA's private projects is very useful as well. There are also a lot of plugins that they provide.The integration is very good. We've more or less integrated with everything including reporting and registering.The product makes it easy to collaborate even though it can use some improvement in that area.The product's centralized database creates a single source of data for working groups so no data needs to be reconciled.The dashboard is the most valuable feature. The user experience is very good, it's easy to use.The developers can simplify tasks and each one of them can undertake a task and then they continue with development. Our processes are more efficient and easier for our manager and developers to track them. Their work is more organized.With JIRA, you can do amazing things by developing connectors, embedding features, and adding new fields to create new things.The solution is very stable.

Read more »

Cons
The inbox feature can be a little overwhelming if you are working with Asana just from its project boards and only checking it periodically.This solution has a learning curve, where it is initially difficult to use.

Read more »

I think their view needs to be more user friendly. The UI makes it difficult to find things. Secondly, the configuration is very complex. JIRA should help people find out what configuration they are using.The workflow needs improvement.Some key features like integration, big data warehousing and data modeling need work.The product could do with more flexible reporting.The initial setup could use improvement.I think that front-end development is a little bit buggy in some cases. Some of the features take a while to respond and some need to be more clear.This solution is not able to be integrated with other solutions because you have to upgrade it and pay for more licensing.n the next version I would like to see better reporting and safer plugins, as well as easier scalability.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price of this solution makes it quite accessible, and the plans fit my budget.

Read more »

The product is really not very expensive.The pricing continues to get higher.We only have nine people using it so we have a standard cost of $150 dollar per year. There are only additional costs if you exceed the limit of users, then you start paying by user. The cost is significantly higher.The pricing of the solution is expensive.This solution has a comparable pricing in comparison to other similar products on the market.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
2,628
Comparisons
2,311
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
410
Avg. Rating
10.0
Views
2,923
Comparisons
1,831
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
501
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Also Known As
Portfolio for JIRA
Learn
Asana
Atlassian
Overview

Asana is web-based software-as-a-service that helps teams coordinate and manage their work. It helps companies move faster by making sure everyone knows the team’s plan and process and who is doing what by when.

Each user can create projects using a list, board, calendar, or timeline view. Within each project, users can add tasks, subtasks, sections, comments, attachments, start and due dates, and custom fields. Project and task followers get notifications on changes or comments on the project and/or task in their Inbox. Individual users can see all of the tasks they're responsible for across all of their projects in a view called My Tasks.

Asana is available in English, French, Spanish, German, and Portuguese.

The agile portfolio management tool, built for JIRA.

With Portfolio for JIRA, you can plan and forecast a realistic roadmap, make data-informed decisions when the unexpected happens, and keep everyone in the know.

Offer
Learn more about Asana
Learn more about JIRA Portfolio
Sample Customers
Uber, Vodaphone, NASA, Spotify, Lyft, Baggu, Udacity, Patreon, Flipboard, Dropbox, Intel, Samsung, Airbnb, SFMoma, Hubspot, TrivagoRosetta Stone, Sprint, UBS, Workday, Expedia, J.P. Morgan
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Comms Service Provider11%
Retailer9%
Financial Services Firm8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Planview, Microsoft and others in Project Management Software. Updated: March 2020.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.