We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"It's a low-code application."
"Overall, I'm satisfied with the product. If you compare it with other products, it's probably not as easygoing or as simple to implement as the rest. But after you get used to it, it works. It has a lot of capabilities and potential, but the people, who come from different technologies, have some difficulty getting used to the way of working with IBM products."
"The possibility to add Java code as embedded .jar, that increases the flexibility of the solution."
"The installation was straightforward."
"The most valuable features are the integration capabilities - BPM can connect with almost any legacy or advanced system."
"I like the APIs and the BPM coach is a good tool. But if I had to pick one, it would be the API."
"This is one of the best tools to support the business and the way we work, and the numerous processes we need to implement."
"One thing that I love about them is that they make it easier to integrate with other systems, especially with the use of smaller files."
"I liked its robustness the most. It was a very robust platform in my experience. It seemed like a very stable and powerful tool for handling lots of concurrent users and hammering at the system."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"The business would like to use the product with a lot less IT and equipment involvement."
"We would like better performance and more visibility on each step of the tool."
"I'm hearing things might be improving, to really deliver on BPM as opposed to simply workflow. That really should be emphasized a lot more than it has been, because a lot of customers will simply implement the process and leave it there, because the product maybe doesn't emphasize BPM as much as it should, as much as maybe they talk about it in the sales process. The whole idea of BPM, is to iteratively improve the process, and in order to do that you have to have the analytics tool with it. A lot of times that doesn't go as far as it should simply because there's a lot more work to be done for that to happen, and just some sort of technical limitations that don't make that as easy as it should be."
"Process Server is no more available than new products out there, but in general IBM has a high cost and complex setup."
"If the processing gets better, it would be more efficient."
"The constant switch between Eclipse and its web versions can be annoying and confusing."
"There are a few areas, like triggering mechanisms, externally exposed variables, and changing its values."
"Initial setup is very complex. Too many steps need to be done at the database and server levels, and complex configurations. From what I see, a lot of these steps can be and should be automated."
AuraQuantic is ranked 18th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow. See our AuraQuantic vs. IBM BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.