We performed a comparison between SharePoint and SignNow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management."The initial setup is easy."
"It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint."
"For any organization with more than one person in it, if they are trying to organize things to let people in the company know what others are doing, then this solution is good for them."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"Quantity and variety of partners with solution development ability on the platform."
"The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search."
"There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."
"The product makes it easy to manage lists, forms, searching, and security. One of the most valuable features is its integration with Active Directory."
"It was easy to send it around to only the relevant parties."
"I like that it works well for my company. I will not be switching to another solution. I don't have any complaints."
"Before we had this solution, we had about 30% of customers that didn't sign agreements. Now that we have SignNow, that number has dropped to less than five percent."
"Replication needs improvement."
"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
"We would like more security features, like automating."
"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."
"SharePoint’s scalability could be improved."
"SharePoint Online could improve the user interface and when modifying any of the user interfaces can be challenging. Additionally, there are challenges with the detail in the analytics user interface and the overall customization could improve."
"I'm not sure if this option was available; however, after having the form signed, I had to send it to a third party that would take the form and deals with it. There wasn't an option to have the forms, once signed, to a third party."
"In the next release, I would like more protection. Security is of the highest importance for our company."
"The area I think this solution can improve is user features."
SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews while SignNow is ranked 5th in eSignature (Electronic Signature) with 3 reviews. SharePoint is rated 7.8, while SignNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SignNow writes "Prompt tech support; good pricing". SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress, whereas SignNow is most compared with DocuSign and Adobe Sign.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
