Compare Citrix ShareFile vs. SharePoint

Citrix ShareFile is ranked 4th in Content Collaboration Platforms with 2 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 37 reviews. Citrix ShareFile is rated 7.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Citrix ShareFile writes "Easy to use alternative to FTP with improved security, reporting and Outlook integration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "The metadata services, the WCF service integration and the Voxel feature are three most valuable elements of this solution". Citrix ShareFile is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive and SmartVault, whereas SharePoint is most compared with OpenText ECM, Box and Atlassian Confluence.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix ShareFile Logo
6,451 views|5,129 comparisons
SharePoint Logo
38,142 views|31,783 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, Google, Dropbox and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: January 2020.
391,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords.

Read more »

The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search.The online editing capabilities, file sharing, auditing, information security, ease of solution management, and the easy user adaptation to the platform are the most valuable features.This solution has helped us with the categorization, organization, management, discovery, and delivery of program and project related information.For any organization with more than one person in it, if they are trying to organize things to let people in the company know what others are doing, then this solution is good for them.The workflow feature is valuable because it enables us to cascade responsibilities.It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint.The metadata services, the WCF service integration and the Voxel feature are three most valuable elements of this solution.Tech support tops off as excellent.

Read more »

Cons
My only issue with this solution is the cost, which should be improved.

Read more »

The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools.The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to cloud can also use improvement.This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities.I would like a simpler, more cost-effective solution for connecting data sources with workflows and BI tools, or data mining tools.Workflow is something that can become more intelligent.Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents.The initial setup was very complex.I understand that some functions are lost when you store the information in a file system, so maybe that's a way SharePoint can improve.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
For this type of solution, it is not wise to buy it without Software Assurance.The pricing works for us.The cost is expensive, but worthwhile.We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design.The data classification and search elements are cheap.The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint.It is very expensive.​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
391,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
6,451
Comparisons
5,129
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
529
Avg. Rating
7.0
Views
38,142
Comparisons
31,783
Reviews
39
Average Words per Review
304
Avg. Rating
7.7
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
ShareFileSharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
Learn
Citrix
Microsoft
Overview
ShareFile is a secure file sync and sharing service that meets the mobility and collaboration needs of users and the security requirements of businesses.

SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

Offer
Learn more about Citrix ShareFile
Learn more about SharePoint
Sample Customers
Exelon, Aer Lingus, Aloysius Stichting, Amnet Technology Solutions, Arup Group Ltd., Brasfield and Gorrie, Cancer Research UK, Carlock, Copeland & Stair LLC, ChanceLightŽ Behavioral Health & Education Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Government12%
Media Company6%
Financial Services Firm6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm15%
University10%
Comms Service Provider8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Financial Services Firm13%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise22%
Large Enterprise42%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise61%
Find out what your peers are saying about Box, Google, Dropbox and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: January 2020.
391,045 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Content Collaboration Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.