Compare Bitbar vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bitbar Logo
1,094 views|653 comparisons
SmartBear TestComplete Logo
19,022 views|12,689 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Ability to use different frameworks."

More Bitbar Pros »

"The most valuable feature is the integration with Azure DevOps.""The most valuable feature of this solution is regression testing tools.""The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers.""The solution is great as a record and playback tool. It also has valuable regression testing.""Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.""The database checkpoints detect problems which are difficult for a human resource to find.""Customer service and technical support responsiveness are high. Everyone is very professional.""The reporting is ready to use and doesn't require any setup."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pros »

Cons
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."

More Bitbar Cons »

"What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing.""The artificial intelligence needs to be improved.""The solution needs Mac OS support. Right now, the solution has only been developed to accommodate Windows OS.""The solution needs more training manuals or some form of online forum for learning. It needs more documentation.""The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS.""Name Mapping feature should be clearer. Whenever I use it, I do not really know what will work and what will not work.""Stability issues occurred only when connecting to the SourceSafe. Sometimes, after getting the latest version, the tool hangs and it should be reopened in order to recover.""The test object repository needs to be improved. The hierarchy and the way we identify the objects in different applications, irrespective of technology, needs adjustments. The located and test objects are not as flexible compared to other commercial tools."

More SmartBear TestComplete Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"This is a pay-per-use service that is not expensive, and cost-efficient if you have a small team.""The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive.""Our ROI is about $10,000 a year.""The option we chose was around $2,000 USD.""The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000."

More SmartBear TestComplete Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Ability to use different frameworks.
Top Answer: Improvement of the product could be made by running the dashboard part, it gets stuck sometimes. Additional features I'd like to see would be the provision of more things with support. I'd like to see… more »
Top Answer: We're using the enterprise statement plan which is provided and sponsored by our company. Our primary use case is for testing the application on different mobile devices and different versions using… more »
Top Answer: Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well.
Top Answer: I'm not sure if there are licensing costs involved in the solution. We simply bought the product outright and started using it.
Top Answer: The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS. Right now, Complete can test only on native… more »
Ranking
27th
Views
1,094
Comparisons
653
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
535
Avg. Rating
6.0
5th
Views
19,022
Comparisons
12,689
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
426
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Also Known As
Testdroid
Learn
SmartBear
SmartBear
Overview
Testdroid is a set of mobile software development and testing products by Bitbar Technologies Limited. Testdroid comprises three different products: Testdroid Cloud, Testdroid Recorder and Testdroid Enterprise. Testdroid provides an application programming interface through open source software available on GitHub. Testdroid can use testing frameworks, such as Robotium, Appium and uiautomator for native and Selenium for web applications, targeted for mobile application and game developers. Testdroid Cloud contains real Android and iOS powered devices, some of which are available for users. Testdroid Cloud lets users run tests simultaneously on cloud-based service. Testdroid Recorder is a tool for developers and testers for recording user-actions and producing JUnit based test cases on mobile application and games. Testdroid Recorder is available at the Eclipse marketplace. Testdroid Enterprise is a server software for managing automated testing on multiple real Android and iOS powered devices, supporting Gradle build system and Jenkins Continuous Integration.

TestComplete is a powerful and robust automated testing tool for mobileweb and desktop  applications. Quickly and easily create accurate and repeatable tests across multiple devices, platforms and environments – regardless of experience level. It supports multiple languages, modern control sets and integrates with open source frameworks and tools like Selenium, SoapUI and Jenkins.

Offer
Learn more about Bitbar
Learn more about SmartBear TestComplete
Sample Customers
Rovio, Paf, Supercell, NITRO Games, Seriously, AVG, Google, Bosch, Yahoo, Microsoft, Yandex, Mozilla, eBay, PayPal, TESCO, Cisco WebEx, Facebook, LinkedIn, skype, SubwayCisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company46%
Comms Service Provider19%
Insurance Company11%
Media Company4%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company28%
Manufacturing Company11%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company37%
Comms Service Provider12%
Media Company6%
Government6%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise37%
Large Enterprise47%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: November 2020.
447,654 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Bitbar is ranked 27th in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review while SmartBear TestComplete is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 9 reviews. Bitbar is rated 6.0, while SmartBear TestComplete is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bitbar writes "Has the ability to use different frameworks for testing although it is lacking in capability options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SmartBear TestComplete writes "Easy set up and test creation but the test object repository needs improvement". Bitbar is most compared with BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, Perfecto Suite, CrossBrowserTesting and Katalon Studio, whereas SmartBear TestComplete is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Ranorex Studio, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus UFT One and Eggplant Functional.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.