We performed a comparison between BizFlow and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."There are so many advantages. First things, like we have a seamless automation capability available here in BizFlow. Totally customizable, UI we can create, and the third-party integration is also achievable. Not with the in-built functionality, but with custom code and all, we can achieve that thing also."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"I have a lot of experience in this kind of industry, and Pega is one of the best solutions in terms of performance, capabilities, and the way we develop."
"The most important features of Pega BPM are case management and claims management, and soon they'll also be offering claims processing. I also love Pega BPM in terms of performance. It's also one of the very few user-friendly solutions in the market. It may take some time to learn Pega BPM, but once you get a proper handle on it, tracking and managing processes become very easy anytime, anywhere. Pega BPM also has very good documentation you can use to learn the solution. Pega has a community portal that has complete information and explanations, and if you're facing a challenge, you can post your challenge on the community portal and get a resolution at the same time."
"The technical support of Pega BPM is very good."
"This is a customizable product."
"Pega is a local platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area."
"It is a stable product."
"Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"Nintex provided an in-built functionality. Like integration-related things, so many service types are available. You just have to configure it. So, such kinds of things decrease the timing of development. So, it is missing in Bizflow."
"The previous versions had good training documents but the updated versions need to improve the documentation."
"Its implementation in the public sector was a bit complex."
"Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"Pega is claiming they're into low code but as per Gartner Magic Quadrant, Pega is not there now."
"It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work."
"This is an expensive solution."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
BizFlow is ranked 29th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. BizFlow is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of BizFlow writes "Seamless automation for workflows, customizable and UI friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". BizFlow is most compared with , whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our BizFlow vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.