We performed a comparison between DarwinBox and PeopleStrong based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of the solution are organogram and position-based mapping."
"The solution that we used previously was very complex. As a result, without referring to the manuals and consulting an expert, it was difficult for a newly hired employee to navigate the platform. However, this is not the case with Darwinbox. It has a very intuitive user interface, and anyone can use it and implement it without having to use a guide or a walk through process. It's very simple."
"In our company, we use DarwinBox to maintain the data of our employees and for recruitment purposes."
"PeopleStrong Alt is flexible because it allows customization and the user's experience is very good."
"Some of the most valuable features are the onboarding experience of new employees, the employee service portal, and the entire performance management system."
"The mobile responsiveness is strong."
"The UI and UX are fantastic."
"The product has valuable flexibility for customization, user interface, and search capabilities."
"The hiring process is good. It will create a process-oriented procedure in terms of hiring, promotion, the movement of people, and other related HR tasks."
"Like most software, it has a base version, the vanilla, out-of-the-box version, and customization is required to match it to the unique processes of each company. The Darwinbox team seems to be having difficulty with the customization process. They have to be a little more mature to customize it as per every company's need."
"DarwinBox is not a stable solution...DarwinBox is not a scalable solution."
"The solution's API integration with third-party applications should be improved."
"They had challenges getting the performance management system up and integrated with our systems."
"They could improve talent management capabilities."
"The global scalability and support could improve."
"The solution's workflow can improve by adding more customization at the organizational level."
"It would be helpful if you could work offline because sometimes, we have problems with internet connectivity."
"They could include a sort of collaborative platform where employees are able to work together with a chat mechanism like WhatsApp and video chat."
DarwinBox is ranked 22nd in Talent Management with 3 reviews while PeopleStrong is ranked 15th in Talent Management with 6 reviews. DarwinBox is rated 6.4, while PeopleStrong is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of DarwinBox writes "Has a very intuitive user interface and a fairly smooth implementation process". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleStrong writes "Has an efficient user interface, but the reporting feature needs improvement". DarwinBox is most compared with SAP SuccessFactors, ZingHR, Workday, Ramco HCM and BambooHR, whereas PeopleStrong is most compared with PeopleSoft, SAP SuccessFactors, SAP HCM, Oracle HCM Cloud and ZingHR. See our DarwinBox vs. PeopleStrong report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors, best Talent Acquisition vendors, and best Cloud HCM vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
