DocuShare vs M-Files comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Xerox Logo
306 views|256 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
M-Files Logo
297 views|201 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DocuShare and M-Files based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "They have an Optical Character Scanning module but we didn't buy it because it's ridiculously expensive."
  • More M-Files Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    306
    Comparisons
    256
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    297
    Comparisons
    201
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Xerox DocuShare's Content Management System gives you the easiest method to manage all of your paper and digital documents

    M-Files is the leading platform for knowledge work automation. With the M-Files platform, knowledge workers can find information faster, work smarter, and achieve more. M-Files features an innovative metadata-driven architecture, embedded workflow engine, and advanced artificial intelligence. This enables customers to eliminate information chaos, improve process efficiency, and automate security and compliance. For more information, visit www.m-files.com.

    Sample Customers
    Lincoln Public Schools, West Orange School District, Tulane University, Niagara Catholic School District, Arig, Co-operative Financial Services, Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation, Volksbank Romania and Iron Mountain, Hammersmith Hospital, Holman Insurance Brokers Ltd., Kaiser Permanente, Convergys Inc., Honeywell, Universal Pictures, McGraw Hill Construction Information Group
    OMV, Caverion, SAS Institute, TK Elevator
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Non Profit9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization19%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Government11%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise42%
    Buyer's Guide
    Enterprise Content Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    DocuShare is ranked 20th in Enterprise Content Management while M-Files is ranked 8th in Document Management Software. DocuShare is rated 8.0, while M-Files is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of DocuShare writes "The command line utilities allow bulk manipulation of documents". On the other hand, the top reviewer of M-Files writes "Good workflows, and it is easy to use with a dashboard that improves contract visibility". DocuShare is most compared with SharePoint and Alfresco, whereas M-Files is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, OpenText Documentum and Microsoft Purview Records Management.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.