Sivanesh WaranSr. Software Solution Engineer at Meteonic Innovation Pvt Ltd at Meteonic Innovation Pvt Ltd
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"The setup is easy and straightforward."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"The most valuable features are the SSIS reports, the deployment models, and the ability to interact with other Microsoft tools."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"Performance-wise, it is a great tool."
"The most valuable features are tools like IntelliSense and ReSharper."
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."
"The service right now is far too expensive. You need to pay per user."
"Enhancing the support for web application testing and load performance would be an improvement."
"The data flow can be improved."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The documents on the Microsoft website are not very useful, and they ought to make it easier to find answers."
"We would like to be able to easily integrate this solution with our continuous integration tools, such as Jenkins."
"The pricing of this solution should be lowered."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
"I think that the pricing is quite good."
"The pricing is expensive."
Earn 20 points
Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.
The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features
Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/squish/Start Your Free Trial Today!
froglogic Squish is ranked 11th in Test Automation Tools with 3 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 8th in Functional Testing Tools with 13 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 9.4, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "Test scripts can be created in multiple scripting languages and the execution can be automated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Good integration between the management data and the test cases". froglogic Squish is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, Selenium HQ, Eggplant Functional, Ranorex Studio and Galen Framework, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Katalon Studio, Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional and SmartBear TestComplete. See our Visual Studio Test Professional vs. froglogic Squish report.
See our list of best Regression Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Regression Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.