Compare GFI LanGuard vs. Quest KACE Systems Management
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This product is a great solution at a great price as long as it is only going to be used for a local area network."
"The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."
"I am impressed by the service desk ticketing and asset management."
Cons
"This solution is limited to the local area network only and cannot manage remote devices."
"The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."
"I've had some issues with patch catalogue."
"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."
Information Not Available
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
464,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Views
1,354
Comparisons
1,007
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
628
Rating
8.0
Views
5,462
Comparisons
3,623
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
216
Rating
8.0
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 55% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 1% of the time.
LanGuard
Dell KACE Systems Management
GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.
The KACE Systems Management Appliance provides a growing organization with comprehensive management of network-connected devices, including servers, PCs, Macs, Chromebooks, tablets, printers, storage, networking gear and the Internet of Things (IoT). KACE can fulfill all of the organization's systems management needs, from initial deployment to ongoing management and retirement.
Learn more about GFI LanGuard
Learn more about Quest KACE Systems Management
BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross
Waypoint, Mattos Filho, Meetic, Gems Education, Green Clinic HealthSystem, Service King
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider20%
Government8%
Educational Organization6%
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government8%
Retailer5%
No Data Available
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise57%
Large Enterprise14%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCL, Ivanti and others in Patch Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
GFI LanGuard is ranked 6th in Patch Management with 2 reviews while Quest KACE Systems Management is ranked 7th in Patch Management with 1 review. GFI LanGuard is rated 8.0, while Quest KACE Systems Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GFI LanGuard writes "Improves network visibility and keeps our products up to date with the latest patches". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest KACE Systems Management writes "Good service desk ticketing and asset management features". GFI LanGuard is most compared with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, SCCM, SolarWinds Patch Manager and Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, whereas Quest KACE Systems Management is most compared with SCCM, BigFix, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, Ansible and ManageEngine OS Deployer.
See our list of best Patch Management vendors.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.