Compare GFI LanGuard vs. Quest KACE Systems Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product is a great solution at a great price as long as it is only going to be used for a local area network.""The most valuable feature is that I am able to patch third-party solutions."

More GFI LanGuard Pros »

"I am impressed by the service desk ticketing and asset management."

More Quest KACE Systems Management Pros »

Cons
"This solution is limited to the local area network only and cannot manage remote devices.""The documentation on how to use this solution in a Linux environment is not clear, which is something that should be improved because it is complicated."

More GFI LanGuard Cons »

"I've had some issues with patch catalogue."

More Quest KACE Systems Management Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"GFI LanGuard has very fair pricing compared to other similar solutions out there."

More GFI LanGuard Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Patch Management solutions are best for your needs.
464,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
out of 19 in Patch Management
Views
1,354
Comparisons
1,007
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
628
Rating
8.0
7th
out of 19 in Patch Management
Views
5,462
Comparisons
3,623
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
216
Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
LanGuard
Dell KACE Systems Management
Learn More
Overview

GFI LanGuard enables complete patch management of security and non-security patches to Microsoft operating systems, Mac OS X, major Linux distributions and third-party applications. It can also automate patching for all major web browsers too.

The KACE Systems Management Appliance provides a growing organization with comprehensive management of network-connected devices, including servers, PCs, Macs, Chromebooks, tablets, printers, storage, networking gear and the Internet of Things (IoT). KACE can fulfill all of the organization's systems management needs, from initial deployment to ongoing management and retirement.

Offer
Learn more about GFI LanGuard
Learn more about Quest KACE Systems Management
Sample Customers
BayView Medical Clinic, FrugalBrothers Software, Zaw, National Theatre, American Red Cross
Waypoint, Mattos Filho, Meetic, Gems Education, Green Clinic HealthSystem, Service King
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider20%
Government8%
Educational Organization6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company25%
Comms Service Provider12%
Government8%
Retailer5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business29%
Midsize Enterprise57%
Large Enterprise14%
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, HCL, Ivanti and others in Patch Management. Updated: February 2021.
464,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

GFI LanGuard is ranked 6th in Patch Management with 2 reviews while Quest KACE Systems Management is ranked 7th in Patch Management with 1 review. GFI LanGuard is rated 8.0, while Quest KACE Systems Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GFI LanGuard writes "Improves network visibility and keeps our products up to date with the latest patches". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest KACE Systems Management writes "Good service desk ticketing and asset management features". GFI LanGuard is most compared with ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, SCCM, SolarWinds Patch Manager and Ivanti Patch for Endpoints, whereas Quest KACE Systems Management is most compared with SCCM, BigFix, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, Ansible and ManageEngine OS Deployer.

See our list of best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.