Compare IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Red Hat Fuse

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Red Hat Fuse and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
We only use the basic features, but the most valuable one for us is the Publish-subscribe pattern.Performance-wise, this solution is really good.It has many interfaces and you can connect to any backend source that has another format, and convert it to the desired format.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pros »

The solution is stable. We have gone for months or years without any issue. There are no memory restarts, so from my point of view, it's very stable.I found it was quite easy to set up and implement.

More Red Hat Fuse Pros »

Cons
Technical support is very slow and needs to be improved.The images and size of the containers are too big and I think that they should be more lightweight.The user interface is designed mainly for experts, much in the way a BPM or another integration tool is.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Cons »

The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower.The web tools need to be updated.

More Red Hat Fuse Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
The price is very high and it's the main reason that we are searching for alternatives.This product is more expensive than competing products.IBM products are generally more stable and have more features, but also come at a greater cost.

More IBM WebSphere Message Broker Pricing and Cost Advice »

We found other solutions were more costly.

More Red Hat Fuse Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which ESB solutions are best for your needs.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
9th
out of 25 in ESB
Views
2,865
Comparisons
2,458
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
499
Avg. Rating
8.0
6th
out of 25 in ESB
Views
6,504
Comparisons
4,416
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
462
Avg. Rating
9.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 28% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
WebSphere Message BrokerFuse ESB, FuseSource
Learn
IBM
Red Hat
Overview
WebSphere Message Broker is an enterprise service bus (ESB) providing connectivity and universal data transformation for service-oriented architecture (SOA) and non-SOA environments. It allows businesses of any size to eliminate point-to-point connections and batch processing regardless of platform, protocol or data format.

Red Hat JBoss Fuse is a lightweight, flexible integration platform that enables rapid integration across the extended enterprise - on-premise or in the cloud. JBoss Fuse includes modular integration capabilities, an enterprise service bus (ESB), to unlock information.

Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Message Broker
Learn more about Red Hat Fuse
Sample Customers
WestJet, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Sharp Corporation, Michelin TireAvianca, American Product Distributors (APD), Kings College Hospital, AMD, CenturyLink, AECOM, E*TRADE
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company42%
Comms Service Provider14%
Insurance Company11%
Media Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company48%
Comms Service Provider9%
Government8%
K 12 Educational Company Or School8%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Red Hat Fuse and other solutions. Updated: July 2020.
431,468 professionals have used our research since 2012.
IBM WebSphere Message Broker is ranked 9th in ESB with 3 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 6th in ESB with 2 reviews. IBM WebSphere Message Broker is rated 7.6, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Message Broker writes "Mature, reliable, and performance-wise it is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Competitive with good technical qualities". IBM WebSphere Message Broker is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods Integration Server, IBM DataPower Gateway, Mule ESB and Oracle Service Bus, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, Oracle Service Bus and Workday Business Process Framework. See our IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs. Red Hat Fuse report.

See our list of best ESB vendors.

We monitor all ESB reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.