Compare Informatica PowerExchange vs. SAP Process Orchestration

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Informatica, Denodo and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The data transformation is the solution's most valuable feature.""The most valuable feature is connectivity to data sources.""Overall, it's a good tool. It's currently number one on the market. It pretty much has all the necessary capabilities to pull the incremental data from the source system, technically speaking.""The transformation work called for Informatica PowerExchange. It was easy to work with this and very stable.""Mainstream integration and real-time integration are the best features.""The user interface and user experience are perfectly all right.""Provides a significant amount of control over the landscape and overall implementation.""This product is easy to install and it can be done in a few hours."

More Informatica PowerExchange Pros »

"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced.""The solution provides very good and central logging systems. It offers high flexibility with vertical and horizontal extend capacity.""The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable.""The initial setup is easy.""The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems.""Great monitoring tools and has its own alert framework.""The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration.""With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pros »

Cons
"The solution needs better integration with other tools.""Technical support can be improved with respect to delays in ticket response time.""The one place where it could be improved is definitely pricing. That's a very big problem. It depends product to product, but pricing is an issue.""Integration with the largest number of databases and other systems would be important.""Real-time has not been enhanced that much over the past few years. There has not been as many features added like they did before.""Informatica is very expensive in all aspects, so the pricing is something that could be improved.""Should diversify more, maybe with a reporting and visualization utility,""I would like to have easier integration with cloud platforms."

More Informatica PowerExchange Cons »

"The responsiveness of technical support needs to be improved.""In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them.""The monitoring governance offered by SAP is too technical and needs to be geared more toward business users.""It does not have all of the industry-standard solutions available in PO and it is not plug and play, so we have to do a lot of development.""The older version of the solution will no longer be supported.""The cloud capability features need improvement.""I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible.""The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."

More SAP Process Orchestration Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good.""The pricing for this solution is fine.""There are fees in addition to the licensing.""It's not an expensive solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The solution offers very good documentation and manuals to assist with understanding the solution.
Top Answer: We centralize all interfaces that we need to have. However, we spend too much money and time to construct each interface. This is required due to the fact that the systems are outdated. We need to be… more »
Ranking
14th
Views
4,617
Comparisons
3,917
Reviews
8
Average Words per Review
411
Rating
8.1
Views
7,063
Comparisons
5,312
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
723
Rating
7.9
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
PowerExchange, Connectors
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration
Learn More
Overview

Informatica PowerExchange Connectors provides high performance, out-of-the-box connectivity without having to develop custom data access programs.

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.
Offer
Learn more about Informatica PowerExchange
Learn more about SAP Process Orchestration
Sample Customers
ACH Food, BNSF Railway Company, Illinois State University
Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm11%
Insurance Company10%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company22%
Energy/Utilities Company22%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company11%
Mining And Metals Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider13%
Manufacturing Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise63%
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Large Enterprise69%
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Informatica, Denodo and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: June 2021.
511,307 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Informatica PowerExchange is ranked 14th in Data Integration Tools with 8 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 3rd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 10 reviews. Informatica PowerExchange is rated 8.2, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica PowerExchange writes "Offers data in real-time using CDC concepts but it should be more flexible ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "Gateway for all integrations that is stable and quick to install". Informatica PowerExchange is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Oracle GoldenGate, SSIS, Qlik Replicate and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, webMethods Integration Server, SAP Data Services, Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Talend Open Studio.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.