We performed a comparison between Make and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Make are the additional options when compared to other similar solutions. For example, with Google my business, you can only do certain things with Zapier, whereas with Make, you can do a little bit more."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"I have a lot of experience in this kind of industry, and Pega is one of the best solutions in terms of performance, capabilities, and the way we develop."
"The most valuable feature is flexibility, as we can configure it to best suit our requirements."
"Make could improve the ease of use, it can be more complicated than other solutions. There are a lot of elements that are more technical than in other solutions."
"The initial setup takes time."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before."
"Pega BPM's documentation should be improved, especially for freshers or new trainees."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
"Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning. One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use."
"I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience."
"I believe that Pega's strategy when it comes to the UX part is not that great currently as compared to the other emerging BPM tools in the market."
Make is ranked 26th in Process Automation with 2 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Process Automation with 55 reviews. Make is rated 7.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Make writes "An affordable cloud solution for automation and data manipulation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Make is most compared with Camunda, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Make vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.