Compare ManageEngine OpManager vs. Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View
 |
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"Flexibility in the two view dashboard helps viewers and admins get the information they need about the fetwork in a flash." "The solution's most valuable feature is its ability to reach most of our network devices and get the most from them." "The most valuable feature is the network-related reporting." "The most valuable feature is the monitoring alerts. The administrators are immediately notified and can do the required action immediately. This is the feature we value and use the most." "It helps us a lot for monitoring our servers in one console, instead of going to individual servers." "The solution offers very good integration capabilities." "The application monitoring is the solution's most valuable feature." "The solution is easy to deploy. It's also easy to manage and monitor the environment. Instead of being reactive, it's proactive." | "The first of the valuable features is how easy it is to access all of the information that's gathered from the assessments... With a lot of other technologies, like Rapid7, if you're using Nexpose you effectively have to be a DBA to get some of the lower-level results from the scans. And Qualys wasn't very intuitive." "The next big one is supportability. In a large enterprise, we have many types of technologies. The technology we previously had didn't even support authentication to a lot of those technologies." "The scanning itself is really the core of the tool, and it's what we're most interested in." |
Cons | |
"The two views into the system are very good but could be extended to further customization to fit the need of end users in a variety of roles." "The initial setup is a bit complicated. It needs a technician who is very aware of the flow and how to officially set up the flow chart, etc." "The dashboard has some limitations and should be more user-friendly." "The storage level monitoring needs improvement. It needs storage level monitoring on the server itself. That feature is lacking right now." "The licensing for this solution is not straightforward and should be improved." "The pricing of the solution is high. They should work to adjust the pricing model to see if they can help reduce costs." "The licensing model is confusing." "The solution is a bit difficult to configure. There are quite a number of configurations and plugins that you must handle early in the process." | "When it comes to... dynamic application scanning, I think they are lagging behind the curve. They have a lackluster solution, to the point where I think they need to determine, as a company, whether or not that's a space they even want to play in." "There are certain circumstances where they may have found a vulnerable service and they just removed the service completely from the device because nobody was using it. There's no way to go into SecurityCenter and mark it, to say, "This is no longer an issue. It doesn't exist anymore." Or, "The risk was accepted for one year, so let's not report it as 'high' until that one year period is done." The handling of operational flow around vulnerability management could be improved." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"As far as cost, it was around six hundred thousand rands ($40,500) for the year, for the renewals. That's the total cost for a four thousand node system including support and maintenance." "The licensing costs depend on the number of devices and accounts that are being monitored by the solution." "The initial cost is low and the add-ons are reasonable." | "We did a three-year deal where the cost is amortized over the three years. The Elite Support was an additional cost to the standard licensing fees... If you use Security Center, most of the time it is on-premise, so you're going to have some sort of infrastructure to build out and there's going to be a cost associated with that." More Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View Pricing and Cost Advice » |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs. 455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: Hi Rigoberto,
We have recently introduced machine-learning enabled forecast reports for utilization and bandwidth usage forecasting. | Ask a question Earn 20 points |
Ranking  | |
Views 6,752 Comparisons 4,898 Reviews 11 Average Words per Review 508 Rating 8.3 | Views 1,066 Comparisons 763 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 2,280 Rating 8.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 28% of the time.  Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 16% of the time.  Compared 7% of the time. Compared 2% of the time. |  Compared 17% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time.  Compared 12% of the time. Compared 9% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| OpManager | SecurityCenter Continuous View, SecurityCenter CV |
Learn | |
| ManageEngine | Tenable Network Security |
Overview | |
ManageEngine OpManager is a network, server, and virtualization monitoring software that helps SMEs, large enterprises and service providers manage their data centers and IT infrastructure efficiently and cost effectively. Automated workflows, intelligent alerting engines, configurable discovery rules, and extendable templates enable IT teams to setup a 24x7 monitoring system within hours of installation. | SecurityCenter Continuous View is the market-leading continuous network monitoring platform. It integrates SecurityCenter along with multiple Nessus Network Monitor sensors and Log Correlation Engine (LCE) to provide comprehensive continuous network monitoring. |
Offer | |
Learn more about ManageEngine OpManager | Learn more about Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View |
Sample Customers | |
| Bonita, Thorp Reed & Armstrong, Galaxy, Fiserv Credit Union Division, Universitas 21 Global, ERP Suites LLC | Methodist Healthcare Ministries |
Top Industries | |
Non Tech Company42% Financial Services Firm17% Healthcare Company8% Wholesaler/Distributor8% Comms Service Provider28% Computer Software Company27% Government5% Healthcare Company4% | Comms Service Provider31% Computer Software Company19% Government13% Financial Services Firm6% |
Company Size | |
Small Business21% Midsize Enterprise26% Large Enterprise53% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine OpManager vs. Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,301 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ManageEngine OpManager is ranked 13th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews while Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View is ranked 35th in Network Monitoring Software with 2 reviews. ManageEngine OpManager is rated 8.2, while Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ManageEngine OpManager writes "The ability to better customize the views helps us target exactly what information gets to the people who need to know it". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View writes "Provides the best network-based vulnerability scanning, but the dynamic scanning is lackluster". ManageEngine OpManager is most compared with SolarWinds NPM, PRTG Network Monitor, Zabbix, Nagios XI and SolarWinds NetFlow Traffic Analyzer, whereas Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View is most compared with Cisco Stealthwatch, SCOM, Fortinet FortiSIEM, LogRhythm NetMon and Nagios Core. See our ManageEngine OpManager vs. Tenable SecurityCenter Continuous View report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.