Compare Meta4 vs. PeopleSoft

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Meta4 Logo
749 views|499 comparisons
PeopleSoft Logo
9,870 views|8,208 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Meta4 vs. PeopleSoft and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Performance appraisal might be the most valuable feature for us.""The most valuable feature of this solution is the payment engine.""The solution has a great payroll engine.""The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature."

More Meta4 Pros »

"I would recommend the solution. It's very stable and scalable, which makes it a reliable solution.""The solution's scalability is good.""Peoplesoft is the best payroll software in the market.""The new version of this solution is very scalable.""The customizations allow us to come up with a lot of complex labor rules. In the Philippines, there's a lot of different kinds of rules you need to be in compliance with. The solution offers up a lot of flexibility and customization that is perfect for our region's requirements.""PeopleSoft is easy to understand, where any end user that is logged in can easily navigate through the menus.""In general, this solution is user friendly and also performs well. There are two types of forms. One is a standardized form, which you can define things into. The other, you can customize so more repetition can be done in an even manner. That way, it can be designed for what the public or user actually wants. It's not very tough for any person, or layman to understand exactly what the screen requires one to do.""The recruiting is most valuable. It saves time in having easy and fast applicants tracking as well as candidates' contact plus pipeline management."

More PeopleSoft Pros »

Cons
"The HR portal, training model, and development career model could all use improvement. Stability and scalability should be improved as well.""I would like to have recruitment and acquisition features added to this solution.""training and performance could be improved.""The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement."

More Meta4 Cons »

"The solution could have better processes and automation, or features that allow for a paperless environment.""The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this.""If there is another release, they should look at going to mobile computing to stay competitive.""There could be more adaptability of the system.""Often support just asks people to install a lot of upgrades. Sometimes they don't really give you clear details as to why you need to upgrade. They just say, "You need to upgrade this because there's a newer image, etc". They never really give you the reason underlying why you are having errors.""It would be helpful for the end-user if the reports were customized. They would be able to select the fields while generating their reports.""I think the inventory part it should be simplified. There is the GR, or good receipt note, which is the time that the materials comes in, and the work days, etc. There is a lot of shuffling through pages, which creates a lot of problems for our users. They don't know which page to go to, where to create a GR, or where to create a stock entry. In other words, all the information is very daunting. It's very easy for people to understand and get a better clarity over it.""Parsing of CVs is productive but accuracy can be improved."

More PeopleSoft Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It's approximately $3,000,000 to $4,000,000 USD per year.""The licensing cost for PeopleSoft is 3,500 per course and the annual subscription fee is 6,500.""I don't know if they are still providing licenses or if they have suspending licenses."

More PeopleSoft Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The performance appraisal is the most valuable feature.
Top Answer: There is no fixed cost, the price depends on the number of employees you want to manage in the solution. In general, if you use the system for many users, the solution becomes cheaper.
Top Answer: The HR portal, training model, and the development career model all need improvement.
Top Answer: I have compared some with Oracle Fusion and all have their pluses and minuses. Workday was too complex for a company to maintain. They replaced PeopleSoft (old version) by Oracle Fusion because… more »
Top Answer: In general, this solution is user friendly and also performs well. There are two types of forms. One is a standardized form, which you can define things into. The other, you can customize so more… more »
Top Answer: I don't know if they are still providing licenses or if they have suspended licenses.
Ranking
9th
out of 52 in Talent Management
Views
749
Comparisons
499
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
237
Avg. Rating
6.8
2nd
out of 52 in Talent Management
Views
9,870
Comparisons
8,208
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
484
Avg. Rating
7.7
Popular Comparisons
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Learn
Meta4
Oracle
Overview

Meta4 cloud solutions offer HR professionals state-of-the-art technology with the best possible user experience for managing the complete employee cycle, from payroll and personnel administration through to global talent management. This all-in-one solution exploit cloud benefits to overcome all the challenges of human capital management, while increasing business productivity and efficiencies.

Oracle's PeopleSoft applications are designed to address the most complex business requirements. They provide comprehensive business and industry solutions, enabling organizations to increase productivity, accelerate business performance, and provide a lower cost of ownership.
Offer
Learn more about Meta4
Learn more about PeopleSoft
Sample Customers
Boehringer Ingelheim, Enlace Operativo, Europcar, Gemalto, GFI Software, Lectra, Pepe Jeans, Public Universities of Andalusia, Securitas Direct, Silver Standard Resources Inc., Telecinco, Zed GroupBMI Healthcare, Lone Star College System, Jefferson County Public Schools, Griffith University, Los Rios Community College District, Tervita Corporation, INFRA S.A. de C.V., ICF Habitat, Central Washington University, Tech Mahindra Limited, Cognizant Technology Solutions, Stanford Childrens Health
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
University12%
Government9%
Local Government9%
Individual & Family Service9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company6%
Retailer5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Large Enterprise86%
REVIEWERS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise64%
Find out what your peers are saying about Meta4 vs. PeopleSoft and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Meta4 is ranked 9th in Talent Management with 5 reviews while PeopleSoft is ranked 2nd in Talent Management with 11 reviews. Meta4 is rated 6.8, while PeopleSoft is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Meta4 writes "A great stable payroll tool with very good payroll engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "User-friendly and performs well but views should be simplified to one page". Meta4 is most compared with SAP HCM, SAP SuccessFactors and Workday, whereas PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle E-Business Suite, SAP SuccessFactors and Oracle ERP Cloud. See our Meta4 vs. PeopleSoft report.

See our list of best Talent Management vendors.

We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.