We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."
"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"This solution is very easy to use and customize, using almost zero coding. It's built on SharePoint which many companies in our country have experience with. This made it easy to adapt the application in our environment."
"It is quite good."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"It provides possibilities for us to save documents and supporting the business process while doing so."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."
"I appreciate Documentum's scalability, allowing for vast volumes of content storage."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"K2's support for DevOp team corporations is weak."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"The user interface can be improved."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"It's difficult to manage and customize Documentum."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
