NTT-AT WinActor vs Pega Robotic Process Automation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
NTT DATA Logo
437 views|306 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Pega Logo
3,482 views|2,602 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between NTT-AT WinActor and Pega Robotic Process Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA).
To learn more, read our detailed Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well.""This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."

More NTT-AT WinActor Pros →

"They are leaders in the same industry.""Pega Robotics offers all the required features to build end-to-end process automation like any other similar tools. It's unique development style using data line and control flow line makes it easy to debug through the flow.""Pega is very mature. It's very old. They have grown with time, and they have learned. Other robotic process automation solutions are basically focused on only doing the automation, whereas Pega also gives you a workflow system so that you can create a workflow.""It is really flexible in what it can do.""It was very smooth and very seamless to create automations.""It helped cut short the release cycle by almost 40% compared to the previous solution.​""User-friendly, easy to understand and has many features including the ability to track.""The tech support is highly available and there is plenty of online training available."

More Pega Robotic Process Automation Pros →

Cons
"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks.""The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."

More NTT-AT WinActor Cons →

"What I don't like that much in Pega Robotic Process Automation is its monitoring tool because that tool is tightly connected with the platform. If the Pega team can deploy the monitoring tool separately, so that it's a separate solution altogether, then that would be good because currently, if you have to use the monitoring tool, then that means you have to use the Pega Robotic Process Automation platform. The initial setup for Pega Robotic Process Automation also needs improvement because it is complex. The only additional feature I'd like to see in the solution is for the monitoring tool to be a stand-alone rather than being tightly coupled with the Pega platform. Looking at the current features of Pega Robotic Process Automation concerning application automation, it covers most of my needs currently.""Excel connectors need to be improved as there are a few connectors in Excel areas.""In Pega, the UI has to be improved because that is the most challenging area that most of our customers ask for because we have to depend on some other React JS or some other tool to bring that kind of UI experience. So, there is a lot of room for improvement in terms of UI and UX.""The ease-of-use could be improved.""Pega Robotic Process Automation scalability is too low.""The way integration classes are created could be improved.""Pega has a no-code low-code environment. We do everything based on established rules. You kind-of have to learn how all their rules work and how it works for robotics before you can use the solution effectively.""I feel like it doesn't get updated frequently enough. There aren't a lot of new features or a clear roadmap for future improvements."

More Pega Robotic Process Automation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay yearly for the agent who runs the processes, plus an additional fee for maintenance costs."
  • More NTT-AT WinActor Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "​I was not involved in licensing and pricing, but it is worth the cost​."
  • "Pega is pretty costly."
  • "Pega Robotic Process Automation is an expensive solution."
  • "In terms of Pega Robotic Process Automation pricing, I would rate it a five out of five because the solution has a good price. Pricing is not very high, though I'm unsure of the exact cost, based on my experience, the price for Pega Robotic Process Automation is less than Blue Prism because I worked with a few clients that have both solutions and my clients prefer Pega Robotic Process Automation over Blue Prism particularly because of the licensing costs."
  • "Pega is as competitive as the basic players such as UiPath or Automation Anywhere. UiPath is the most expensive, but Pega is at par with Automation Anywhere."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten."
  • "The licensing cost is too high."
  • More Pega Robotic Process Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well.
    Top Answer:The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data.
    Top Answer:For the repeat tasks, we have two options. The first option is to use the scanner to set up the scheduler. Alternatively, we can use another method where we set up the task or schedule on the manager… more »
    Top Answer: The solution's automation handling capability has positively impacted the overall automation process in my experience.
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a six out of ten, with ten being expensive.
    Top Answer:It's a good tool, but I feel like it doesn't get updated frequently enough. There aren't a lot of new features or a clear roadmap for future improvements. While it's technically sound, it could be… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    437
    Comparisons
    306
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    170
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    3,482
    Comparisons
    2,602
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    609
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    NTT WinActor, WinActor, NTT-AT Robotic Process Automation Software, NTT-AT RPA
    Pega RPA, OpenSpan
    Learn More
    Pega
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    NTT-AT RPA accurately reproduces workflows - from simple form processing to sophisticated tasks - to streamline work.

    With Pega Robotic Process Automation (RPA), organizations can automate the mundane, tedious, time-consuming, manual work that is hampering productivity and efficiency. Whether adjudicating claims, onboarding customers or employees, reconciling financials, updating customer information in systems record, Pega RPA can manage the work across your enterprise.

    Sample Customers
    Exeo Tech Corporation
    eBay Enterprise, M&I Bank
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company45%
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Insurance Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about UiPath, Microsoft, Automation Anywhere and others in Robotic Process Automation (RPA). Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    NTT-AT WinActor is ranked 27th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews while Pega Robotic Process Automation is ranked 9th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 22 reviews. NTT-AT WinActor is rated 7.0, while Pega Robotic Process Automation is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of NTT-AT WinActor writes "Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega Robotic Process Automation writes "Great for UI creation, helpful support services, and reliable". NTT-AT WinActor is most compared with UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate, whereas Pega Robotic Process Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Pega CRM.

    See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.

    We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.