Compare Oracle BPM vs. webMethods Integration Server

Oracle BPM is ranked 28th in Business Process Management with 4 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in ESB with 8 reviews. Oracle BPM is rated 6.0, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "An enterprise-grade solution with a powerful Workspace and a complete feature set". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Integration Server and Universal messaging create an efficient development phase, enhance agility". Oracle BPM is most compared with IBM BPM, ARIS BPM, Pega BPM, Bonita and Bizagi, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with Mule ESB, IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, SAP Process Orchestration and Mule Anypoint Platform. See our Oracle BPM vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda BPM Logo
32,196 views|20,961 comparisons
Oracle BPM Logo
2,540 views|1,770 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BPM vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface.It has an open BPMIt allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products.The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand.The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part.When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version.The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read.The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable.

More Camunda BPM Pros »

The initial setup is straightforward.Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes.The Workspace is a full, rich application where most users can find what they want. It shows them a list of their work.This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations.

More Oracle BPM Pros »

The tool is very powerful and user-friendly.The most valuable feature is stability.All of the components are very independent but are tied together to give the business value.A product with good API and EDI components.We can arrange data caching and look at the solid state. Also, the API gateway is a very good component that can handle relevant cachings and integrations, as well as and also load permitting.It's obvious that the heart of the product lies here. It's comprised of all aspects of ESB (Enterprise Gateway, Adapter, TN, Java) and BPM (task, rules engine).We have a reusable code that we can replicate for any new interfaces.

More webMethods Integration Server Pros »

Cons
The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages.Lacking in forms visualization.If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map.Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance.I would also like a very easy to use form builder.I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution.The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself.

More Camunda BPM Cons »

The solution needs to offer better integration with third-party systems.We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues.Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter.Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption.

More Oracle BPM Cons »

I would like to have a dashboard where I can see all of the communication between components and the configuration.Technical support is an area where they can improve.The price should be reduced to make it more affordable.The interface needs some work. It is not very user-friendly.We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics.t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData.We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable.

More webMethods Integration Server Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I use the open-source free version.Camunda is much cheaper.We are using the open-source version of this solution.It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range.

More Camunda BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

The licensing model is good.

More Oracle BPM Pricing and Cost Advice »

This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced.The vendor is flexible with respect to pricing.The pricing and licensing costs for webMethods are very high, which is the only reason that we might switch to another product.It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one.Some of the licensing is "component-ized," which is confusing to new users/customers.

More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management solutions are best for your needs.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Learn
camunda
Oracle
Software AG
Overview

Camunda BPM is a light-weight, open source platform for Business Process Management. It is a perfect match for general software development and provides powerful business-IT-alignment based on BPMN for structured workflows, CMMN for less structured cases and DMN for business rules.

Typical use cases for Camunda BPM are:

  • Straight Through Processing (STP)
  • Human Workflow Management
  • (Dynamic) Case Management
  • Business Rule Automation
The Industry's Most Complete and Unified BPM Solution A complete solution for all types of processes that provides a unified process foundation, user-centric design, and social BPM interaction. Reduces complexity and risk and increases business efficiency, visibility, and agility.

The award-winning webMethods Integration Server, our Enterprise Service Bus (ESB), is a complete enterprise application integration solution. It's standards-based so it "speaks" any technology. You can integrate any technology from any vendor: ERP systems, databases, mainframes and legacy apps. SaaS platforms, Web services, JMS messaging systems and packaged apps.

Offer
Learn more about Camunda BPM
Learn more about Oracle BPM
Learn more about webMethods Integration Server
Sample Customers
AT&T Inc., Allianz Indonesia, Deutsche WertpapierService Bank AG, CSS Insurance, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, VHV Group, freenet Group, Swisscom AG, Zalando SE, AccruentState Revenue Office Victoria, New South Wales Health, REDISA, Panduit, Total E&P IndonesieFujitsu, Coca Cola, ING, Credit Suisse, Electrolux, GTA, CosmosDirekt
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm25%
Non Profit25%
Comms Service Provider13%
Construction Company13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company39%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company6%
Government6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company63%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm7%
Insurance Company3%
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company15%
Insurance Company15%
Manufacturing Company15%
Computer Software Company15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company45%
Comms Service Provider11%
Media Company7%
Retailer5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business55%
Midsize Enterprise15%
Large Enterprise30%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise72%
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise33%
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Large Enterprise83%
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle BPM vs. webMethods Integration Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
430,223 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of .

We monitor all Business Process Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.