We performed a comparison between Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and SAP Process Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In our DW/BI solution, ODI is the main tool to integrate the data in a daily batch way."
"Easy to understand, very developer-friendly, and has a big forum community and lots of documentation for support."
"The most valuable feature that we use is the Knowledge Modules."
"ODI significantly improves data integration and management by allowing customization of data types from various sources like SQL Server databases."
"It has the ability to easily load slowly changing dimensions."
"All our systems can be widely integrated by ODI, such as transactional systems, our data warehouses, and B2B integration."
"It allows us to use many languages to develop and to integrate practically all the technologies of the Oracle suite as well as those from non-Oracle vendors."
"I like that Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) has a straightforward setup and offers good technical support."
"With the latest version what I find to be the most valuable are the REST, SuccessFactors, and Ariba Network adapters."
"The most valuable feature is the seamless integration with backend systems."
"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."
"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"Process Orchestration fulfils the need for middleware to mediate types of connectivity."
"At present, when multiple steps are executed in parallel in the load plan and errors occur, the error handling mechanism does not function correctly."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is real-time integration. Currently, my company has a workaround to implement real-time integration, an area on which Oracle must focus more. Real-time integration should be easier in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). Another area for improvement in Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is integration with more publishers and subscribers rather than just database integrations."
"The performance of the user interface is in need of improvement."
"Technical Support could be better."
"Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is already good as a solution. Still, it needs some editing of its preview package, or if the package is upgraded, that will make Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) even better."
"The resource management aspect of the solution could be improved."
"The stability of the software could be improved. Sometimes, the software just crashes. "
"ODI could improve by being more user-friendly. Informatica, which is also an ETL tool, similar to ODI, but Informatica is very user-friendly, easy to use, and simple to integrate, compared to ODI. ODI has many features, put them all together, and sometimes we get confused about which ones to use, which ones not to use."
"The usability is an area where it can be improved upon."
"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."
"In terms of technical support, it would be helpful if they handled the tickets a bit faster when queries are sent to them."
"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."
"The product roadmap suggests it will approach the end of support in several years, and a lot of innovations are now implemented by SAP not in SAP PO, but in SAP Integration Suite, hence, the platform is stable, but doesn't receive a lot of new features in recent updates."
"SAP Process Orchestration breaks down sometimes."
"Data modeling is an area of concern in the product where improvements are required."
"It requires some maintenance."
Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is ranked 4th in Data Integration with 67 reviews while SAP Process Orchestration is ranked 1st in Business-to-Business Middleware with 28 reviews. Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is rated 8.2, while SAP Process Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) writes "Straightforward to implement, scalable, and has good stability and documentation, but technical support could still be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Process Orchestration writes "A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations". Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) is most compared with Oracle Integration Cloud Service, Informatica PowerCenter, SSIS, Azure Data Factory and Oracle GoldenGate, whereas SAP Process Orchestration is most compared with Mule Anypoint Platform, SAP Data Services, IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, webMethods Integration Server and IBM B2B Integrator. See our Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs. SAP Process Orchestration report.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.