We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The robotic process automation has increased the confidence of business users."
"The solution has very helpful technical support."
"It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get."
"When our clients automate the KYC and onboarding processes, they can reduce their manual force and then deploy them in much better tasks rather than the mundane activities of selecting forms and gathering information."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"Scalable and stable BPM software with a powerful case management feature. It also has good workflow."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is step-by-step voice guidance that converts your problem statement into different diagrams and then implements the process."
"My primary use case for this solution is to display the process in a graphical representation."
"There have been some performance scalability issues. Suppose you want to add more users. You go from, say, 800 users to 1,500 users, and sometimes that creates issues for which there is no clear explanation. To fix it you have to escalate it with customer service and sometimes the response is not up to the mark in resolving those issues."
"This is a quite expensive product."
"I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"It is not fully compatible with all versions of Internet Explorer, so sometimes, it does not work."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"One of the areas of this solution that could be improved would be to advance the low code features of the application itself. We would also like to use the same platform to build any application, even if it is not necessarily defined as a functionality needed by a BPM."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"The odata can be improved. It represents to users flexible process that can manage and monitor their own business process."
Earn 20 points
Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Business Process Management (BPM). Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is rated 6.6. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] writes "Why you should choose SAP BPM as process management discipline?". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM, whereas SAP NetWeaver BPM [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.