Compare Pega BPM vs. Zudy VINYL

Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 6 reviews while Zudy VINYL which is ranked 2nd in Rapid Application Development Software with 20 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.6, while Zudy VINYL is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Rapid renew structure allows for better implementation over other solutions and aids clients in serving their customers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zudy VINYL writes "Lite Integration enables us to easily pull data together from several systems, without coding". Pega BPM is most compared with Camunda BPM, Appian and ServiceNow, whereas Zudy VINYL is most compared with QuickBase, OutSystems and Mendix. See our Pega BPM vs. Zudy VINYL report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Pega BPM Logo
14,942 views|8,176 comparisons
Zudy VINYL Logo
5,421 views|1,942 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Pega BPM vs. Zudy VINYL and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
359,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Powerful, full-featured business process management with excellent supportWhile Pega technical support is okay, it also depends on the issues you need help with and who your contact is with Pega.The most valuable features are case management and integration services.It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get.The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features.Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support.Allowed us to develop and quickly release with confidence using cloud technologies.Fast prototyping.

Read more »

It's made things seamless and it's more efficient, and there's an audit trail where it wasn't there before.One of the most valuable features of the solution is how rapid we can implement it, going from a design to an operational concept in a very short period of time.VINYL has given us the ability to really improve the speed with which we deploy releases and respond to the good ideas that our people have.There are two most valuable features: one is the ability to pull data from a bunch of different places and put them together. And the second is the speed at which you can get a new app developed. So instead of waiting months for this new app to come out, if you have an internal team putting it together, you can roll it out in weeks. I've even seen days. It's incredible how fast you can make changes.VINYL has really helped us speed up application development at a reasonable cost.We have been able to leverage the platform to rapidly build custom solutions, and tailor-make them to our needs.It's extremely easy to use in getting into the IDE and then back down to your applications, and getting from your applications to your pages, and navigating through all your tables. That's very simple and pretty intuitive.It allows us higher visibility into our data, which allows us to data-check faster, and validate data that we had not been able to validate, prior.

Read more »

Cons
Lack of stronger cloud support is somewhat inconvenient for users and implementation.What should be included is some UI features and maybe some integrations. This includes documentation on how the UI works.The unit testing needs to improve, as well as the user interface.The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother.There have been some performance scalability issues. Suppose you want to add more users. You go from, say, 800 users to 1,500 users, and sometimes that creates issues for which there is no clear explanation. To fix it you have to escalate it with customer service and sometimes the response is not up to the mark in resolving those issues.It is scalable, but it also interacts with a lot of other systems. I think they thought that the interface to other systems, legacy systems, was its strength, but when problems do occur, quickly diagnosing those problems has been a challenge.Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services.Business specific functionality is needed.

Read more »

Right now it's very dependent on having an imagination to understand.I'd like to see the next release of VINYL have more user interface solutions to it, so that it could be a more user-friendly product on the front end for the customers that are utilizing the tool. We didn't have a solution to help automate all of our reporting in the past which identified the need to make sure that we could tap into our data sources and automate all of our reporting, which is exactly why we needed the tool.The features that I'd like to see in VINYL next would be the ability to have more control over, or have a rule-based control over column headings and column labels.Some new features I think I'd like to see is visibility into running jobs so that we can see what the status is, or it's not stuck in its process and doing its thing, or how much longer it's going to take. I'd also like to see a native calendaring function so we can put calendars into our apps with maybe even recurring tasks or appointments and that sort of thing. We'd also like to see multi-select lists. The users being able to pick multiple things to filter on and get a list and be able to export that list.The ease of use for individuals to self-serve could be improved. The solution is no-code, but there is still a decent learning curve associated with the product and some app design principles necessary before people can self-serve.When you are trying to delete certain columns or delete or drop tables, it will throw an error and it will force you to hunt down every location where those things are being referenced. You have to delete them from the very end and work your way backward... It would be easier, when you're deleting that table, if it would concatenate all the way down.There are a lot of almost "hidden" features captured in these Edge Case settings... If you want a scroll bar at the bottom, instead of having it select rows to show, you have to select Disable Panel Location Service, which doesn't sound at all like what it's supposed to do. Naming conventions could be changed a little bit.One of the troubles we have sometimes is the amount of data we're processing within the applications. That can really add a lot of "laggy-ness." That's an ongoing struggle we're going to have while we use it. It doesn't happen for all our applications, only some of them that are heavy on the reporting.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
May be somewhat more expensive than other solutions initially, but should have enhanced return on investment.The licensing fees are based on the number of users.They have both on-premise and cloud licensing. If you are a small to medium company, go for the cloud option because that eliminates a lot of the setting up of your DevTest and performance environments, multiple environments, because you can buy that from Pega with the cloud option. So your setup time really goes down. If you're a large company, then you're better off putting it within your company. You have other skill resources within your company to create environments.They need to come up with licensing options. Right now they do have a cloud-based option, but the cloud prices I've seen are much more expensive compared to competing products.Licensing is expensive. You need to wisely select between per user and per case.

Read more »

The value for us for VINYL is that we've got one fee that we're paying per year and we can deploy and build as many apps and bring in as many users as we need.The licensing costs we pay are, I believe about 5,000 a month. That's every quarter. We've been doing it for about a year now, and the prices have remained steady. We feel it's a reasonable cost for what we're getting because it's unlimited users. So as big as you want to make it, you're not constrained by a per-user licensing cost or any of those other restrictions, so that's going to stifle your development.Our licensing costs are approximately 100K annually, and from my perspective, that really is quite the value with the flexibility and what we're getting from the product.The pricing is moderate. It's okay.Pricing and licensing are expensive.We have seen a 30 percent decrease in time for some of our workflows.I feel the product’s pricing is a good value. The licensing model is very straightforward. You license the platform and you can build however many solutions you want with it.Pricing was actually one of the things that drew us to the product initially... the way it was licensed at the time, I got a flat monthly fee from Zudy for the Vinyl product, which allowed me to basically have unlimited use of it... We have an annual license, we pay monthly. It's very competitive and very worthwhile given the return we get out of it.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
359,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
14,942
Comparisons
8,176
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
567
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
5,421
Comparisons
1,942
Reviews
20
Average Words per Review
960
Avg. Rating
8.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 52% of the time.
Compared 21% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Also Known As
Pegasystems, SmartBPM
Learn
Pega
Zudy
Overview

Pega BPM helps you simplify and automate your operations so that you can reduce costs and improve business agility. Pega's unique Build For Change technology delivers repeatable solutions that can be efficiently reused and tailored to meet the requirements of diverse customers, product lines, channels, and geographies.

Zudy is a visionary enterprise application development company with a breakthrough no-code platform known as VINYL. VINYL’s patented technology-agnostic development environment turns mobile and web into one, enabling enterprises to build highly configurable applications in just days rather than months. Using VINYL, enterprises can dramatically increase the number of new applications they can build from an average of three per year to more than 50.

Offer
Learn more about Pega BPM
Learn More about Zudy VINYL

No-Code Development - Stay Informed

Sample Customers
The State of Maine, ANZ, Coca-Cola, Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA), ME, New South Wales, OptumRx, Texas Department of Transportation, UnitedHealthcare Medicare & RetirementBrooks Brothers, Stericycle, DXL, Aetna, JCrew, Barstool Sports, iHeart Media, Cal-Maine Foods Inc, Collette Travel, Kraft Sports Group, Fresh Direct
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm27%
Manufacturing Company15%
Pharma/Biotech Company9%
Comms Service Provider9%
REVIEWERS
Pharma/Biotech Company13%
Non Tech Company13%
Manufacturing Company13%
Leisure / Travel Company13%
Find out what your peers are saying about Pega BPM vs. Zudy VINYL and other solutions. Updated: July 2019.
359,556 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email