We performed a comparison between PeopleSoft and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The synchronization of business processes, and the software, streamlined the shared service departments to run 40% leaner."
"PeopleSoft allows you to schedule upgrades and inform users beforehand. This gives your IT team time to manage the implementation and minimize disruption."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its stability."
"PeopleSoft is an amazing solution. Its users can have total control of the system, including PeopleCode, Application Engine and Component Interface, along with many other tools delivered by PeopleSoft."
"We use a lot of typical cases from PeopleSoft, for example, solutions for security, business performance, monitoring processes, and a lot of training."
"The breadcrumb approach to navigation in PeopleSoft is good. nVision is also a good supplement."
"The integration between Human Capital Management (HCM) and PeopleSoft is an important feature."
"It is a very stable ERP solution. It is also supported on Oracle Cloud and provides extensive features."
"The solution's new UI called Fiori is user friendly."
"We have access to all types of reports in a single solution."
"The scalability is excellent, especially on cloud deployment models."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the SAP Fiori application."
"The solution can scale well."
"Because I'm a procure-to-pay consultant, I mostly look at that angle, and I have a bit of experience with sales and distribution. I also like the integration between S/4HANA and other ERPs because S/4HANA is a suite. For example, the integration between S/4HANA and EWM Transportation Management, and Ariba."
"It is the most stable solution provided by SAP and can be used on all levels."
"S4HANA is relatively stable."
"PeopleSoft should be more flexible with the configuration. There should be less coding and more configuration."
"It would be nice if it became even more declarative in its development."
"One of the areas that could improve is the capability of utilizing mobile for some of the self-service activities that are missing. They are running on the older platform. What is happening is people are focusing on the cloud. PeopleSoft is a good provider and should into the cloud. That could be an advantage for them. Customers would not have to go find another solution that is a completely different platform that has different functionality altogether."
"The UI and user experience are not great, and it's not as feature-rich as today's systems. Furthermore, our implementation does not include all the components we need, like payroll or some other functions."
"The solution needs to work on its mobile technology. We're hoping in the next version we're working on implementing, 9.2, will have more of this."
"The API integration could be better."
"It would be helpful for the end-user if the reports were customized. They would be able to select the fields while generating their reports."
"Having applications which provide more enhanced features and user-friendly elements."
"The integration could be made a little simpler in terms of design and implementation."
"SAP support provides resolves all our problems, but the response time is slower than our customers expect. Maybe it's because they have such a large customer base and are always occupied, but that's one area all our customers mention."
"Lacking in some customizations."
"There should be an easier way to migrate customers from all versions to SAP S/4HANA."
"The difficulty level of the initial setup depends on the person's skills. If you know the basic knowledge of the database, then it will be easy, otherwise, it will be very difficult."
"We would like to see more DevOps capabilities in the future."
"I have found the solution to be stable but it could improve."
"The solution is quite expensive."
PeopleSoft is ranked 11th in ERP with 80 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. PeopleSoft is rated 8.0, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of PeopleSoft writes "Comprehensive solution for SCM but requires add-ons for fluid pages". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". PeopleSoft is most compared with Oracle HCM Cloud, Workday, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP SuccessFactors and PeopleStrong , whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our PeopleSoft vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.