We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The user interface is fine."
"The tool's most valuable features are scripting, correlations, and parameterization. Debugging is also easy."
"The product is good, and the concept is good as well."
"With Performance Center, the version upgrade is easy. You just have to roll out the new patch or the new version."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The tool is very easy to set up and get running."
"This is a product that has a lot of capabilities and is the most mature tool of its kind in the market."
"It's a very powerful tool."
"The ability to quickly make your own components has been valuable."
"The tool has highly detailed debugging features."
"Customization is the most powerful feature of this product."
"The solution is very useful for compiling existing projects and developing new projects."
"The most valuable feature has been to store all our packages in one place including SSIS packages, SQL tables, TFS and SSR."
"The solution is easy to use and they have also integrated with Microsoft."
"We are satisfied with technical support. Communicating with them is very simple. We also have a lot of online resources to check and to study and to train our team with. The documentation is very clear and readily available."
"One of the best documentation in the world."
"We are expecting more flexible to use Jenkins in continuous integration going forward."
"For such an experienced team as mine, who have been with the product for over ten years, sometimes working with technical support is not that easy."
"The price of this solution could be less expensive. However, this category of solutions is expensive."
"I have seen some users report some issues, but I have personally not had any issues."
"More real-time monitoring should be available for the system under test."
"It would be beneficial if LoadRunner could optimize resource usage, especially for protocols that require significant resources, like TrueClient, which interacts directly with the UI. If they could improve resource usage, like ingest or for the load generator, using less CPU or RAM memory, that would be great. That's where I have problems."
"The process of upgrading LoadRunner can be difficult and time-consuming."
"When we have a new application, recording the application is a pretty tough task. We have tried multiple things. We do scripting or try to record with different settings and on different machines. We try to record multiple times, but we do not know why it is recording and why it is not recording. We do the same thing on different machines. It sometimes records, and at other times, it does not. That is one of the major concerns."
"The solution's documentation could be improved because it keeps disappearing from the solution."
"The product must provide more automation."
"The server that we use is very slow so that is concerning for us."
"The database administration could be better; you should be able to choose new tools with the development environment in Visual Studio. It could be easier to use."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"The integration with Git needs improving because it is a bit disjointed and unpredictable."
"The solution is quite expensive."
"Sometimes Visual Studio is slow. It uses a lot of resources like memory and processing power. You should optimize the performance by only installing what you need on your machine. Don't install unnecessary things that will slow your machine."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText Silk Performer, Tricentis NeoLoad and OpenText UFT One, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText LoadRunner Professional.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
