Sophos UTM vs pfSense

pfSense is ranked 4th in Firewalls with 21 reviews vs Sophos UTM which is ranked 3rd in Firewalls with 18 reviews. The top reviewer of pfSense writes "The performance and functionality are good. I can manage it easily by myself". The top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "Initial configuration was super simple. Management and monitoring have never been easier". pfSense is most compared with Sophos UTM, Fortinet FortiGate and Cisco ASA. Sophos UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, pfSense and WatchGuard XTM. See our Sophos UTM vs pfSense report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos UTM vs pfSense and others in Firewalls.
283,979 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Sophos UTM vs pfSense

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Stability has been excellent. We have experienced no issues; it never fails.Its features rival many of the high cost solutions out there.The initial setup was straightforward, therefore I wanted to continue using the product.I can manage it easily by myself.The performance and functionality are good.Creation of certificates and the facility to administer services are valuable features.It is a good firewall with good performance.Centralized administration with multiple services, which allows for execution in several important functionalities of information security.

Read more »

It improved bandwidth utilization and provided link load balancing features for internet and intranet lease lines.It now controls all the security aspects of our web servers with Sophos UTM WAF.​We use Sophos UTM as our main firewall with all its features included. Mainly, it controls all of our network perimeter security: firewall, IDS/IPS, and web application firewall (including VoIP).​The initial configuration is straightforward thanks to the web GUI. In 30 minutes, you can have a running firewall with UTM protection enabled.​Brings greater visibility into the network traffic coming inside and passing away from the company.They are all good, but most-used are Network Protection and Web Filtering.Scaling out cannot be easier, as there are many migration paths.Advanced protection (Sophos Sandstorm) - Protects against crypto viruses in real-time.

Read more »

Cons
It is not centrally managed, where you log into the website and can see all your services there. We would like to be able to see is all the configurations from a central interface on all our pfSenses.The GUI could use improvements, though it is manageable.A malware blocker should be included. I do not know if it is included yet. However, until now, we have not experienced a large malware invasion.It requires more attention to provide a better alternative for open source to small government or educational institutions with reduced budgets in terms of technology.Needs services on additional features, such as managing inventory and generating reports.My only observation is about the quality of the IPSec logs, which are difficult to interpret and are poor in filters.​Improve analysis of logs and dashboards (control panel) with improved alert functionality.It should integrate with LDAP, Active Directory, etc, to improve the way in which the traces and connections of each IP, or user connected through the firewall, are shown.

Read more »

Initially, there were issues with the wireless network as wireless access points were disappearing from the dashboard after some time.​Reporting: We have had to work manually in many of our reports.Needs to improve the certificate management (ex. Let's Encrypt support).VPN needs IKEv2, but it’s in the roadmap. Also, all new, cool features will only come to the new Sophos XG Firewall.There is still room for improvement in wireless protection. I don't mean their WiFi device is bad, but there are still things to improve on, such as WiFi roaming.​This product could use some improvement with web filtering. It takes a lot of time and effort to set up and maintain.​Finding information about Sophos’ sizing guidelines can actually be difficult. Also, Sophos does not make it clear what they mean by “users” when you are sizing a firewall, which then leads to undersized implementations.​​I am going to flat out say technical support is terrible. Being a Platinum level customer, I am not happy with the support.​

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It is a free solution.It is economical (i.e., free).From Sonic Wall, their price is much higher, because for every feature that you want to add, you have to pay. I can do the same things with pfSense, but everything is included in one price.There are a few features not included, and when you have to use those features, you have to pay for them.It is an open source solution. Therefore, the price is good.It works quite well for an open source product.If you need to buy hardware onto which to install PfSense, go with their boxes on their website, they are great.It's open source (and free - as in beer and speech), but also has commercial support.

Read more »

We purchased the appliance with five years onsite support and licenses.Pricing for the upgrade was very competitive as Sophos wanted to retain existing customers.​In the case of a software/virtual appliance subscription, you pay by protecting user/IP addresses. You can do this to as much hardware resources as you like.​​The pricing for Sophos UTM is quite acceptable compared to other UTM vendors.If you would like to run an active-passive HA system, you only need to buy an additional hardware without subscription. At other vendors, you need subscription for both devices.​For under 50 users, MSP licensing is profitable.Sometimes more is less, meaning if you want more than three features, take the FullGuard licence.Sophos offers free training when selling their products from within the partner portal.​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewalls solutions are best for your needs.
283,979 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
66,711
Comparisons
45,932
Reviews
22
Followers
2,987
Avg. Rating
8.6
Views
85,439
Comparisons
55,856
Reviews
18
Followers
2,894
Avg. Rating
8.8
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more pfSense competitors »
Compared 31% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
See more Sophos UTM competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsAstaro
Website/Video
Website/VideopfSense
Sophos
Overview
OverviewProviding comprehensive network security solutions for the enterprise, large business and SOHO, pfSense solutions bring together the most advanced technology available to make protecting your network easier than ever before. Our products are built on the most reliable platforms and are engineered to provide the highest levels of performance, stability and confidence.The global network of highly skilled researchers and analysts, protecting businesses from known and emerging malware - viruses, rootkits and spyware.
OFFER
Learn more about pfSense
Learn more about Sophos UTM
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersNerds On Site Inc., RKC Development Inc., Expertech, Fisher's Technology, Ncisive, Consulting, CPURX, Vaughn's Computer House Calls, Imeretech LLC, Digital Crisis, Carolina Digital Phone, Technigogo Technology Services, The Simple Solution, SwiftecITInc, Rocky Mountain Tech Team, Free Range Geeks, Alaska Computer Geeks, Lark Information Technology, Renaissance Systems Inc., Cutting Edge Computers, Caretech LLC, GoVanguard, Network Touch Ltd, P.C. Solutions.Net, Vision Voice and Data Systems LLC, Montgomery Technologies, Techforce, Concero Networks, ASONInc, CPS Electronics and Consulting, Darkwire.net LLC, IT Specialists, MBS-Net Inc., VOICE1 LLC, Advantage Networking Inc., Powerhouse Systems, Doxa Multimedia Inc., Pro Computer Service, Virtual IT Services, A&J Computers Inc., Envision IT LLC, CommunicaONE Inc., Bone Computer Inc., Amax Engineering Corporation, QPG Ltd. Co., IT 101 Inc., Perfect Cloud Solutions, Applied Technology Group Inc., The Digital Sun Group LLC, FirespringOne Housing Group
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University
16%
Comms Service Provider
16%
Healthcare Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
REVIEWERS
Retailer
14%
Religious Institution
14%
Mining And Metals Company
14%
Legal Firm
14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Non Tech Company
7%
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
67%
Midsize Enterprise
21%
Large Enterprise
12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
39%
Midsize Enterprise
37%
Large Enterprise
23%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
68%
Midsize Enterprise
16%
Large Enterprise
16%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
46%
Midsize Enterprise
36%
Large Enterprise
18%
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos UTM vs pfSense and others in Firewalls.
Download now
283,979 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email