Sophos UTM vs pfSense

pfSense is ranked 4th in Firewalls with 19 reviews vs Sophos UTM which is ranked 3rd in Firewalls with 19 reviews. The top reviewer of pfSense writes "Users can work offsite through the VPN. ". The top reviewer of Sophos UTM writes "Initial configuration was super simple. Management and monitoring have never been easier". pfSense is most compared with Sophos UTM, Fortinet FortiGate and Cisco ASA. Sophos UTM is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, pfSense and WatchGuard XTM. See our Sophos UTM vs pfSense report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Pfsense vs. sophos utm report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos UTM vs pfSense and others in Firewalls.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Sophos UTM vs pfSense

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
Creation of certificates and the facility to administer services are valuable features.It is a good firewall with good performance.Centralized administration with multiple services, which allows for execution in several important functionalities of information security.The gain in performance and security from configuring the VPN connections was significant.It is a stable solution.Improved service performance and availability through redundancy.An incomparable stability is achieved with other firewall systems.Firewall system for small, medium, and large data networks. It allows you to provide security to your environment: DMZ networks, LAN, WAN, etc.

Read more »

It improved bandwidth utilization and provided link load balancing features for internet and intranet lease lines.It now controls all the security aspects of our web servers with Sophos UTM WAF.​We use Sophos UTM as our main firewall with all its features included. Mainly, it controls all of our network perimeter security: firewall, IDS/IPS, and web application firewall (including VoIP).​The initial configuration is straightforward thanks to the web GUI. In 30 minutes, you can have a running firewall with UTM protection enabled.​Brings greater visibility into the network traffic coming inside and passing away from the company.They are all good, but most-used are Network Protection and Web Filtering.Scaling out cannot be easier, as there are many migration paths.Advanced protection (Sophos Sandstorm) - Protects against crypto viruses in real-time.

Read more »

Cons
It requires more attention to provide a better alternative for open source to small government or educational institutions with reduced budgets in terms of technology.Needs services on additional features, such as managing inventory and generating reports.My only observation is about the quality of the IPSec logs, which are difficult to interpret and are poor in filters.​Improve analysis of logs and dashboards (control panel) with improved alert functionality.It should integrate with LDAP, Active Directory, etc, to improve the way in which the traces and connections of each IP, or user connected through the firewall, are shown.Reporting and real-time monitoring, since I'm used to Watchguard's reporting features, it would be nice to have an embedded solution for reporting.The GUI. There are TONS of plugins for pfSense, as such, if a user wants to add quite a bit of functionality, the GUI will feel a little congested.Network monitoring and device inventory could use some improvements. I'm using SpiceWorks for this because it never really worked in pfSense.

Read more »

Initially, there were issues with the wireless network as wireless access points were disappearing from the dashboard after some time.​Reporting: We have had to work manually in many of our reports.Needs to improve the certificate management (ex. Let's Encrypt support).VPN needs IKEv2, but it’s in the roadmap. Also, all new, cool features will only come to the new Sophos XG Firewall.There is still room for improvement in wireless protection. I don't mean their WiFi device is bad, but there are still things to improve on, such as WiFi roaming.​This product could use some improvement with web filtering. It takes a lot of time and effort to set up and maintain.​Finding information about Sophos’ sizing guidelines can actually be difficult. Also, Sophos does not make it clear what they mean by “users” when you are sizing a firewall, which then leads to undersized implementations.​​I am going to flat out say technical support is terrible. Being a Platinum level customer, I am not happy with the support.​

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It works quite well for an open source product.If you need to buy hardware onto which to install PfSense, go with their boxes on their website, they are great.It's open source (and free - as in beer and speech), but also has commercial support.Spend at least $300 or more on a good pfSense box. Use a hard drive, and not a USB flash drive for pfSense storage.Unless they have specific requirements that demand a particular device, I always suggest pfSense specifically because of the absence of pricing and licensing.PFSENSE turns out to be very economical, the license is free and for little money you get very good support

Read more »

We purchased the appliance with five years onsite support and licenses.Pricing for the upgrade was very competitive as Sophos wanted to retain existing customers.​In the case of a software/virtual appliance subscription, you pay by protecting user/IP addresses. You can do this to as much hardware resources as you like.​​The pricing for Sophos UTM is quite acceptable compared to other UTM vendors.If you would like to run an active-passive HA system, you only need to buy an additional hardware without subscription. At other vendors, you need subscription for both devices.​For under 50 users, MSP licensing is profitable.Sometimes more is less, meaning if you want more than three features, take the FullGuard licence.Sophos offers free training when selling their products from within the partner portal.​

Read more »

Pfsense vs. sophos utm report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos UTM vs pfSense and others in Firewalls.
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
60,552
Comparisons
44,733
Reviews
19
Followers
3,635
Avg. Rating
8.6
Views
78,837
Comparisons
55,636
Reviews
17
Followers
3,270
Avg. Rating
8.8
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Sophos logo
Compared 32% of the time.
Fortinet
Compared 17% of the time.
Cisco
Compared 9% of the time.
See more pfSense competitors »
Fortinet
Compared 31% of the time.
Pfsense logo chopped reasonably small
Compared 26% of the time.
Watchguard logo
Compared 6% of the time.
See more Sophos UTM competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsAstaro
Website/Video
Website/VideopfSense
  • Vendor 22828 screenshot 1524950803
Sophos
  • Vendor 8030 screenshot 1523367281
OverviewQuestionmark icon
OverviewProviding comprehensive network security solutions for the enterprise, large business and SOHO, pfSense solutions bring together the most advanced technology available to make protecting your network easier than ever before. Our products are built on the most reliable platforms and are engineered to provide the highest levels of performance, stability and confidence.The global network of highly skilled researchers and analysts, protecting businesses from known and emerging malware - viruses, rootkits and spyware.
OFFER
Learn more about pfSense
Learn more about Sophos UTM
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersNerds On Site Inc., RKC Development Inc., Expertech, Fisher's Technology, Ncisive, Consulting, CPURX, Vaughn's Computer House Calls, Imeretech LLC, Digital Crisis, Carolina Digital Phone, Technigogo Technology Services, The Simple Solution, SwiftecITInc, Rocky Mountain Tech Team, Free Range Geeks, Alaska Computer Geeks, Lark Information Technology, Renaissance Systems Inc., Cutting Edge Computers, Caretech LLC, GoVanguard, Network Touch Ltd, P.C. Solutions.Net, Vision Voice and Data Systems LLC, Montgomery Technologies, Techforce, Concero Networks, ASONInc, CPS Electronics and Consulting, Darkwire.net LLC, IT Specialists, MBS-Net Inc., VOICE1 LLC, Advantage Networking Inc., Powerhouse Systems, Doxa Multimedia Inc., Pro Computer Service, Virtual IT Services, A&J Computers Inc., Envision IT LLC, CommunicaONE Inc., Bone Computer Inc., Amax Engineering Corporation, QPG Ltd. Co., IT 101 Inc., Perfect Cloud Solutions, Applied Technology Group Inc., The Digital Sun Group LLC, FirespringOne Housing Group
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider
17%
University
17%
Healthcare Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Non Tech Company
6%
REVIEWERS
Comms Service Provider
22%
Retailer
11%
Religious Institution
11%
Mining And Metals Company
11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer
8%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Non Tech Company
7%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
67%
Midsize Enterprise
21%
Large Enterprise
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
38%
Midsize Enterprise
39%
Large Enterprise
24%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
68%
Midsize Enterprise
16%
Large Enterprise
16%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
45%
Midsize Enterprise
37%
Large Enterprise
17%
Pfsense vs. sophos utm report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Sophos UTM vs pfSense and others in Firewalls.
Download now
270,647 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email